It'd be the same fireloading as a D and you'd flow 2; Thom would be sprinklering the attic in CO, not as a CO.
Careful, there are times we can draw parallels between 13, 13r, 13d, and times where logic has NOTHING to do with it. glc -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dewayne Martinez Sent: Friday, April 09, 2010 12:19 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: Unfinished basements in 4-family NFPA 13R occupancy I goofed and laid out the sprinklers at 225sf but have made the corrections by adding some sprinklers and bringing them down to 130sf. It just seems weird that the same unit when finished is considered part of the dwelling unit and can be protected with residential heads calculating 4 max while on the unfinished side I have to pick up 900 sf min because it's larger than the 500sf exception of 6.8.2.2. There could potentially be the same fire load in each. Dewayne _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected] To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected] (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
