As a friend and lurker said off forum - let the 4th alarm guys worry about
the FDC.

>From my experience as a FF real world I'd say:
1. First on arrival nothing showing, go inside to investigate.

2. First on arrival light smoke, go inside with hose to investigate.

3. First on arrival heavy smoke, go inside with big hose to investigate. Or
perhaps initiate rescue without line especially if 2nd is right on your
heels and can get the line. 2nd secure water supply. 3rd help with big line
or take a second line.  At some point 4th or more think about FDC.  

4. First on arrival through the roof, set up the ladder pipe. Or perhaps
initiate rescue of some sort. 2nd secure water supply. 3rd set up big line,
master streams.  At some point 4th or more think about FDC. 

I think the text book would say:
1. Same

2. FDC first, the sprinklers know where the fire is.  I'd say hard to argue
but the fire is probably out/controlled and this residual smoke.  

3. FDC first but I'd argue the sprinklers have failed in some way and
probably won't be much of value.  If they failed with the wrong density
maybe FDC will help.  But if I can reach the seat of the fire with a 2.5" I
can knock a lot of fire down quick.  Pumping a lot more water through the
FDC through all the extra open heads or broken pipe most likely isn't
reaching the seat of the fire.  But until I go in I don't know if I can
reach the seat of the fire.  Remember the FF's are there 10-20 minutes
average AFTER the fire started.  

4. FDC first but the sprinklers have failed in a big way and you have closed
valves or broken piping.

A lot also depends on what you are bringing.  1 engine with 2 FF's with help
20 minutes away vs. a big city with 4 engine, rescue and a ladder or 2 all
with at least 4 FF's per rig on the first alarm and a second complement 5
minutes behind them.  You also have to think about the FF's don't see too
many fires with sprinklers so altering first arrival tactics is hard
considering certain things are engrained and FDC is the rare exception.



Chris Cahill, P.E.
Fire Protection Engineer
Sentry Fire Protection, Inc.
 
763-658-4483
763-658-4921 fax
 
Email: [email protected]
 
Mail: P.O. Box 69
        Waverly, MN 55390
 
Location: 4439 Hwy 12 SW
              Waverly, MN 55390
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brad
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 9:37 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: FDC on Limited Area Sprinklers

Thanks Rich,
What do you Fire Dept people think about taking the time to connect to an
FDC that serves a limited area? Limited area does not require to be
monitored- although there will be local audible alarm- I guess when you get
there, if the bell is ringing, and you need to, go ahead and take the time
to connect?

-----Original Message-----
From: Richardson, R [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 9:22 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: FDC on Limited Area Sprinklers

If the scenario is AHJ say so - we do it, no questions allowed, then make
the AHJ decide this question as well.  Seems kind of hard to consult for a
project when there is an unbridled authority making up stuff in the first
place.  

Personally if I were the consultant and was not inclined to question the
AHJ, I would not specify an FDC in this situation.

Rich Richardson
Seattle Fire Department

-----Original Message-----
From: Brad [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 07:06
To: Richardson, R; [email protected]
Subject: RE: FDC on Limited Area Sprinklers

Cooler/freezer with combustible insulating panels

-----Original Message-----
From: Richardson, R [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 9:03 AM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: RE: FDC on Limited Area Sprinklers

If it is in the consulting stage maybe the client would be better served to
have the AHJ questioned as to the "legality" of the requirement.  

Your statement that the   "The bldg is 'too small to REQUIRE sprinks', but
the AHJ wants some heads in a particular area." is worthy of further
exploration.

What exactly is the hazard at issue here anyways?

Rich Richardson
Seattle Fire Department

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brad
Sent: Monday, May 10, 2010 06:43
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: FDC on Limited Area Sprinklers

Thanks Thom ,George, Chris,
Sorry for the delayed reply- I do not have IAH (internet at home).
The area is actually quite a bit less than 2000 SF. The bldg is 'too small
to REQUIRE sprinks', but the AHJ wants some heads in a particular area. EC
is correct to stay less than 20, though, bcoz there is some 'above and
below'. All heads will be calc'd (on one level). It is in the consulting
stage, so by the time it is bid, the Sprink will know whether or not to
include the FDC. I took the '2000 SF building' to mean 2000 SF of
sprinklers, remembered we deal with emergency situations, and thought about
the 'probable waste of time' thing for Limited Area sprinklers.
Thanks again,
Brad 
-----Original Message-----
From: George Church [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 3:55 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: FDC on Limited Area Sprinklers

What about the adjacent and unprotected combustible concealed space- doesn't
that mean you calc 3,000 SF of that 2,000 SF area? 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Thom McMahon
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 4:35 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]; 'Chris
Cahill'
Subject: RE: FDC on Limited Area Sprinklers

Use EC heads and you'll still be under the 20 by a long way.

Thom McMahon, SET
Firetech, Inc.
2560 Copper Ridge Dr
P.O. Box 882136
Steamboat Springs, CO 80488
Tel:  970-879-7952
Fax: 970-879-7926



-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brad
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 11:55 AM
To: 'Chris Cahill'; [email protected]
Subject: RE: FDC on Limited Area Sprinklers

Good thoughts Chris, thanks.
Now for a specific- Bldg code calls for 1 story, not over 2000 SQ FT - no
FDC required-- what about a 4000 SF bldg (sprinklers not Required, but AHJ
wants a limited area (less than 2000 SF) sprinklered)-- I know it is up to
him/her on the FDC, what are your thoughts? 

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Cahill [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 12:40 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: RE: FDC on Limited Area Sprinklers

Even if the fire isn't in the area it doesn't harm anything to hook up to
it.  They will bring the system pressure up to 150 psi and it will be
static.  The sign is already required.

Now if you want to debate FDC's and are they really needed on any system
then sure.  Talking simple sprinklers not standpipes.  Think if it this way
how many times does an FDC make a difference in the outcome?  I suspect not
often. But in the grand scheme FDC's are not a big portion $$$ of a job so
we'll just keep them. 

Chris Cahill, P.E.
Fire Protection Engineer
Sentry Fire Protection, Inc.
 
763-658-4483
763-658-4921 fax
 
Email: [email protected]
 
Mail: P.O. Box 69
        Waverly, MN 55390
 
Location: 4439 Hwy 12 SW
              Waverly, MN 55390

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brad
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2010 12:30 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: FDC on Limited Area Sprinklers

What do you Forumites think about this? I think an fdc should be PROHIBITED
on Limited Area systems-

Probable waste of time is the reason. I guess an exception could be if there
is a laminated diagram posted at the FDC- 'Attention Fireman-

Unless the fire is in THIS area, do NOT connect'

Thanks,

Brad

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to