Maybe if the pipe is rehung/replaced do those heads.  Not sure what the
issues would be if under a section that didn't fall. Yeah motion I'm sure
was sent through the entire building during the collapse.  No worse I'd
think than an earthquake which can last minutes.  Best I know they don't
replace heads after an earthquake.

Or like Matt suggested test a couple in the adjacent part and replace all
that fell.

Perhaps FM might be a resource? Seems to me they'd have some experience with
partial collapsed sprinklered buildings.        

Chris 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David Bitton
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 3:51 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Rebuilding a sprinkler system after a partial roof collapse

I agree with the concept, but how far would you go?  The collapse affected
parts of 2 systems but there are 16 systems in this building.  Would you
make an argument that the adjoining sprinkler systems were also affected?
Should it be based on the distance from the collapsed section or the
sprinkler piping layout?

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chris Cahill
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 4:40 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Rebuilidng a sprinkler system after a partial roof collapse

With the cost of heads being relatively cheap it's not even a question in my
mind - replace them. 

Chris Cahill, P.E.
Fire Protection Engineer
Sentry Fire Protection, Inc.
 
763-658-4483
763-658-4921 fax
 
Email: [email protected]
 
Mail: P.O. Box 69
        Waverly, MN 55390
 
Location: 4439 Hwy 12 SW
              Waverly, MN 55390

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David Bitton
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 3:37 PM
To: 'Sprinkler Forum'
Subject: Rebuilidng a sprinkler system after a partial roof collapse

Hello all,

 

A 14,000 sq. ft. section of a large warehouse collapsed, bringing down some
sprinkler piping that will need to be replaced.  I am concerned that the
operating elements on the remaining sprinkler heads have been weakened by
the pipe movement during the collapse and would fail once we do the
hydrostatic test on the system, causing water damage to the stock.  Are
there any guidelines for determining whether the remaining heads need to be
replaced?  (A visual inspection revealed no apparent damage to these heads.)


 

Thanks,

 

 

David Bitton, Eng.

Quest Loss Control Services Inc.

Les services de prévention des sinistres Quest inc.

5100, rue de la Savane, bureau 200

Montréal, QC H4P 1T8

(514) 341-4545

www.questlosscontrol.com

 

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to