....or clothes drying in front of a radiant heater !

Stewart
On 23 Aug 2010, at 16:29, Ron Greenman wrote:

> What's so humorous about all this is that so many fire stations burn
> down while the troops are away. Usually because they left the stove
> on. So residential fires?
> 
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 7:17 AM, Todd Williams <[email protected]> wrote:
>> There was a fire house built across the line in RI a few years back (pre The
>> Station) and sprinklers were not installed for similar reasons. Must be
>> contagious. Maybe they are required to sleep in flame retardant Dr. Dentin's
>> (I'm not that old; I've read about them)
>> 
>> 
>> At 10:13 AM 8/23/2010, you wrote:
>>> 
>>> You'd think the Fire Marshal would have explained he'd take the tradeoff
>>> of
>>> less fire/more water damage any day, and gone on about 20 GPM vrs 250 GPM
>>> but- he didn't.
>>> And the first guy to testify for the homebuilders in at the PA Hearings
>>> was
>>> a builder/fire chief, the one pointing out that if you had residential
>>> sprinklers and your house caught fire, you'd have 700 gallons of water in
>>> your basement. See- tat's terrible. Until you realize your alternative is
>>> watching your house burn down.
>>> We're doing a new, wood truss roofed fire company here in Central PA.
>>> Originally had a 15,000 gal tank, pump, and full wet and dry protection
>>> throughout. Now- after their variance was accepted- it has a 13D tank and
>>> pump and not even a dozen heads to protect the bunkroom. See, if the
>>> building catches fire, they can run out of the sprinklered bunk room into
>>> the burning building where they'll get in the fire truck, pull it out of
>>> the
>>> building, stop, and pull the hoses off and put the fire out. See how easy
>>> it
>>> is to provide Equivalency? Since they are firefighters, we can have them
>>> run
>>> thru the flaming building on the way to get their turnout gear on since
>>> they're trained. Not sure what training does to protect your body from
>>> flame
>>> on way to get turnout gear, but - they're trained and its been deemed
>>> Equivalent protection to a full 13 system throughout.
>>> 
>>> Sarcasm <off>, head shaking at those that should know better. I will not
>>> be
>>> able to refrain from saying "I told you so" if this one burns down. Well,
>>> maybe just "DUH- what did you expect would happen?"
>>> 
>>> glc
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [email protected]
>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stewart
>>> Kidd
>>> Sent: Monday, August 23, 2010 9:38 AM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: Another fine piece of journalism - NOT!
>>> 
>>> George is of course, right.
>>> 
>>> But with respect, the journalist appear to have been only quoting the Fire
>>> Marshal - it surprises me to find that there are still people out there
>>> who
>>> should know better when commenting on the effects of a sprinkler
>>> operation.
>>> Wouldn't it have been nice if the first responding fire truck had been
>>> carrying a wedge or sprinkler stopper ?
>>> 
>>> Stewart Kidd
>>> Cambridge, England
>>> On 23 Aug 2010, at 14:07, George Church wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Careful- the $1,000 is the damage from the FIRE.
>>>> Damage from the sprinkler is what was EXTENSIVE.
>>>> 
>>>> They'd have been so much further ahead to not have the fire
>>>> extinguished by a 20 GPM sprinkler, they could have let the fire rage
>>>> outa control for awhile before having the FD show up and drown it.
>>>> Then the water damage would have been less than the Fire damage and we'd
>>> not get bad press.
>>>> 
>>>> We had a similar situation when one head saved a modular plant. I
>>>> explained its tough to have a sprinkler system work with less than one
>>>> head flowing, we really did the best we could. How would we know
>>>> maintenance would let the sprinklers run for an hour, thinking they'd
>>>> shut off the system when they hit the OFF button on the fire pump
>>>> controller. Course it was 50 PSI city not 150 PSI boosted city, so I
>>>> guess it looked OFF in comparison. Sure took a long time to drain, tho.
>>>> 
>>>> glc
>>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: [email protected]
>>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> Sent: Monday, August 23, 2010 8:31 AM
>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>> Subject: RE: Another fine piece of journalism - NOT!
>>>> 
>>>> $1000 is EXTENSIVE damage?  Really?
>>>> 
>>>> Craig L. Prahl, CET
>>>> Fire Protection Specialist
>>>> Mechanical Department
>>>> CH2MHILL
>>>> Lockwood Greene
>>>> 1500 International Drive
>>>> Spartanburg, SC  29304-0491
>>>> Direct - 864.599.4102
>>>> Fax - 864.599.8439
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://www.ch2m.com
>>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: [email protected]
>>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2010 1:31 PM
>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>> Subject: Another fine piece of journalism - NOT!
>>>> 
>>>> Bethlehem police and fire officials are investigating a fire at a
>>>> woman's apartment Thursday morning that has been ruled an arson.
>>>> 
>>>> The fire happened around 8:30 am at a third-floor apartment at the
>>>> Moravian House, 70 W. North St. No one was injured and police and fire
>>>> officials declined to release the woman's name, pending completion of
>>>> the investigation.
>>>> 
>>>> The fire was set on the floor of the woman's bathroom and while the
>>>> flames only damaged a rug and shower curtain, there was extensive
>>>> damage because a sprinkler was activated, Bethlehem Fire Marshal Robert
>>> Novatnack said.
>>>> 
>>>> Water from the sprinkler went from the third floor all the way into
>>>> the building's basement and damaged other apartments and offices,
>>>> Novatnack said. He estimated damage from the fire at around $1,000.
>>>> 
>>>> - Pamela Lehman
>>>> 
>>>> (from the Morning Call Allentown, Pa.)
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>>>> 
>>>> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
>>>> 
>>>> To Unsubscribe, send an email
>>>> to:[email protected]
>>>> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>>>> 
>>>> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
>>>> 
>>>> To Unsubscribe, send an email
>>>> to:[email protected]
>>>> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>>>> 
>>>> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
>>>> 
>>>> To Unsubscribe, send an email
>>>> to:[email protected]
>>>> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>>> 
>>> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
>>> 
>>> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
>>> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>>> 
>>> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
>>> 
>>> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
>>> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>> 
>> Todd G. Williams, PE
>> Fire Protection Design/Consulting
>> Stonington, CT
>> 860.535.2080
>> www.fpdc.com
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
>> 
>> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
>> 
>> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
>> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Ron Greenman
> Instructor
> Fire Protection Engineering
> Bates Technical College
> 1101 So. Yakima Ave.
> Tacoma, WA
> 
> 253.680.7346
> 
> Member:
> AFSA, SFPE, ASCET, NFPA, NFSA, AFAA, ASEE, NIBS, WSAFM, WFC
> 
> They are happy men whose natures sort with their vocations. -Francis
> Bacon, essayist, philosopher, and statesman (1561-1626)
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
> 
> For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]
> 
> To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
> (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to