I can't agree with your logic although I think I understand the point you
are making.  In my opinion the design is not finished until the PE stamp is
applied.  At that point the PE takes responsibility for all that has gone
into the job.  I don't feel this is even questionable.  However, if you are
assuming this practice is always performed by someone not qualified, then
you are into another area of discussion.  In this case, the PE stamp would
not be valid if the engineer walked the site, performed the flow test,
measured the building, drafted the drawing, pulled the catalog cuts
together, performed the calculations, and made the coffee.

Bill Brooks

William N. Brooks, P.E.
Brooks Fire Protection Engineering Inc.
372 Wilett Drive
Severna Park, MD 21146-1904
410-544-3620
410-544-3032 FAX
412-400-6528 Cell


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeff Hewitt
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 12:54 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Louisiana Professional of Record question

Regardless of a contractor's intentions, good or otherwise, I have a problem
with this whole process as described.  Getting a PE to stamp something,
AFTER the fact, AFTER it has been already been designed, is NOT KOSHER, or
at least questionable at best, especially if the PE is not
qualified/experienced with fire protection.  This is a violation of the PE
law in most if not all states, and certainly the spirit of the NICET Code of
Ethics as well. 

While it is obvious that Bobby's Company's intentions are good, I am certain
that a LARGE number of contractors out there do not understand the legal
issues involved, and view the need for a PE stamp as just one more obstacle,
one more thing to do to get a permit, just another nuisance cost, and do
exactly what I have described, go and get some PE, any PE that is willing
for a small fee, to stamp their drawings AFTER the FACT.

This is wrong, it is unethical, and illegal for both the PE and the
contractor, and god forbid something happens on one of those jobs, and
everyone gets called to court, or your insurance company finds out.  You
think you're covered, but you're not.  The stamp was obtained illegally, and
therefore your professional liability and errors and omissions coverage is
denied.

This is not another PE vs. layout technician thing. Rather, this is a
statement that if a PE is required, then do it correctly.

Just my 2-cents.  Sorry for the rant, and no offense intended towards Bobby.


Jeff Hewitt, PE, SET, SFPE (Professional Member)
Corporate Engineer
Bi-State Fire Protection Corporation

241 Hughes Lane
St. Charles, MO  63301
636-946-0011
636-946-5172 (fax)
314-574-6989 (cell)

Fire Sprinklers Save lives.
Can You Live Without Them?


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bobby Gillett
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 11:20 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Louisiana Professional of Record question

Lately we have had projects that require us to provide PE stamps. The last
few projects, we were informed after award of contract and before submittal
that we had to have a PE stamp on our drawings. We have a local PE that will
do this, so we send in a change and get him to review and then approve. When
he looks at them he researches the project, design build or not, and makes
sure that everything is done per code before he will sign off. Some of the
projects have a PE on record for the fire protection portion of the project
and still want us to provide a PE stamp before submittal, that's the one
that I do not understand; if they are the engineer of record for the fire
protection on the project, why won't they do like they used to and review
and stamp once it is approved through them? We have even bid a few that
require this in the specs. now - even if the FP portion is engineered from
the beginning.

 

Bobby Gillett

Sr. Project Manager

Key Fire Protection, Inc.

(731) 424-0130 office  (731) 424-9285 fax 

(731) 267-4853 cell

 <mailto:[email protected]>
[email protected]

 

 

  _____  

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeff Hewitt
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 11:06 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Louisiana Professional of Record question

 

Craig,

Sounds like someone has some "splainin" to do Lucy.

Just because something is done as a design-build project would not somehow
negate the need for a PE.  In fact, just the opposite would hold true.
Design-build implies PE involvement.

In addition, if I was the AHJ, at this point, it is already designed (and
perhaps in for permit and rejected), and now you want to add a PE and come
back with the same design stamped by a PE, I would reject that as well, as
it is obvious the PE just stamped the plans after the fact, and did not do
or supervise the design.

Good luck.

Jeff Hewitt, PE, SET, SFPE (Professional Member)
Corporate Engineer
Bi-State Fire Protection Corporation

241 Hughes Lane
St. Charles, MO  63301
636-946-0011
636-946-5172 (fax)
314-574-6989 (cell)

Fire Sprinklers Save lives.
Can You Live Without Them?

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
[email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 10:02 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Louisiana Professional of Record question

What if it was done by a contractor as a design-build project?  No PE
involved.

Craig L. Prahl, CET  
Fire Protection
CH2MHILL
Lockwood Greene
1500 International Drive
Spartanburg, SC  29304-0491
Direct - 864.599.4102
Fax - 864.599.8439
CH2MHILL Extension  74102
[email protected]



-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dale Wingard
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 8:55 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Louisiana Professional of Record question

Craig,

He has to be a PE.  It is normally the Engineer that is part of the original
design of the project.


Dale F. Wingard, SET
Design Manager
Triple "A" Fire Protection, Inc.
251.649.2034
[email protected]

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
[email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 5:22 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Louisiana Professional of Record question

I need to know from someone who regularly works in Louisiana what the
submittal procedure is if drawings are produced for an owner from an outside
design firm who is not the installing contractor.

Is a POR required to be a PE?

Where are the qualifications listed for the POR in relation to sprinkler
shop drawings?

Craig L. Prahl, CET  
Fire Protection
CH2MHILL
Lockwood Greene
1500 International Drive
Spartanburg, SC  29304-0491
Direct - 864.599.4102
Fax - 864.599.8439
CH2MHILL Extension  74102
[email protected]

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

  _____  

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1170 / Virus Database: 426/3291 - Release Date: 12/01/10

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to