Also, you stated "Seems to me the design doesn't exist until the PE signs
the drawing and supporting paper (like spec's, calc's, etc).  A signed
drawing is a design everything else up to that point is?...but random lines
on a paper? How the design got to exist is semantics?

I cannot disagree more.  Just because someone went and got a PE, any willing
page stamper to seal their drawing does NOT make it a design at that point.
It is not a legal design if the stamp is not legit, i.e. stamped by a
QUALIFIED PE.  ALL that it means is that they tried to "game" the system to
get their permit.  How is the public safety served by such abuse?

Jeff Hewitt, PE, SET, SFPE (Professional Member)
Corporate Engineer
Bi-State Fire Protection Corporation

241 Hughes Lane
St. Charles, MO  63301
636-946-0011
636-946-5172 (fax)
314-574-6989 (cell)

Fire Sprinklers Save lives.
Can You Live Without Them?


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chris Cahill
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 6:57 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Louisiana Professional of Record question

Maybe it's a definition of design that will help clear this up.  I'm a
little lost at what Jeff takes issue with.  How is any of this different
than a tech, NICET or otherwise, qualified (which is subjective) or not,
putting together a plan and giving it to his boss, the PE, for correction,
comment, improvement and/or signature?  Seems this issue isn't even a FP
issue but a question of all engineering.  Seems to me the design doesn't
exist until the PE signs the drawing and supporting paper (like spec's,
calc's, etc).  A signed drawing is a design everything else up to that point
is?...but random lines on a paper? How the design got to exist is semantics?
Seems there is little difference whether the PE and techs are employed by
the same company.  I once learned the standard ratio is 5 techs per PE (all
engineering not just FPE).  Although I suspect that is a little outdated. 

For example "I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was
prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a Professional
Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota."  Are we talking the
definition of 'direct'?  The MN PE Board ruled on a complaint I filed 10-12
years ago that a PE located MI (and lic in MN) could in fact sign the work
admittedly done here by a non-PE.  I can't quote the exact wording but it
was to the effect they could not rule on the point of direct supervision as
there were nearly infinite ways to accomplish direct supervision.  Once
signed it was then a design qualified by the PE and how it got to exist they
weren't really interested in.   

If you are speaking of SFPE white paper on PE and Tech's role in design
there are few states following this model that I know of.  As a matter of
fact the MN PE board dismissed the PE's role in sprinklers a long time ago. 

I don't consider the MN Board much different than the average Board.  I know
of some better, some worse, certainly don't know all.   

On Bobby's statement "He does his job all the way through, and at that point
he will not stamp our drawings - he creates his own, calculates them himself
and then stamps his drawings."  Why, if it's all right?  Sounds like a
marketing issue not an engineering one.  I suppose that is a reason as
justifiable as some others I can't think of. Does he do this as well for any
techs working for him?  Sounds to me like he needs new techs if so.  

Chris Cahill 


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeff Hewitt
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 11:21 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Louisiana Professional of Record question

Bobby,

If your engineer is making changes to your design and is redrawing for
submittal, all the better, but I was not referring to you or your company.
It sounds like you have someone that is qualified to perform these duties,
and do it in a legal and ethical way.

My statement is about this process in general, not about you specifically.  

You cannot tell me that what I described does not occur everyday all over
this country, by those that either do not know, are willing to risk it, or
do not care, and not just in our field of fire protection.

Jeff Hewitt, PE, SET, SFPE (Professional Member)
Corporate Engineer
Bi-State Fire Protection Corporation

241 Hughes Lane
St. Charles, MO  63301
636-946-0011
636-946-5172 (fax)
314-574-6989 (cell)

Fire Sprinklers Save lives.
Can You Live Without Them?


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bobby Gillett
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 12:00 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Louisiana Professional of Record question

I disagree.

 

The Arch/Eng and owner require us to get a PE stamp. Yes that does create
another obstacle, but we have a Mechanical (including fire protection) PE
available locally that is used as the FP engineer of record by many
architects on new projects in our area. When it is required, we hire him to
do ours and he wants all of the specs and drawings, as well as the contacts
for all involved. He researches the entire project to make sure that the
fire protection is correct to the application, codes and area - including
other things I am sure I am not aware of. He does his job all the way
through, and at that point he will not stamp our drawings - he creates his
own, calculates them himself and then stamps his drawings. These are now the
drawings that are used for submittal and the project, all the way to
As-Builts. If there are any re-submittals or changes necessary to his
drawings, he does them - all of this is part of his fee. 

 

Bobby Gillett

Sr. Project Manager

Key Fire Protection, Inc.

(731) 424-0130 office  (731) 424-9285 fax 

(731) 267-4853 cell

 <mailto:[email protected]>
[email protected]

 

 

  _____  

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeff Hewitt
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 11:54 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Louisiana Professional of Record question

 

Regardless of a contractor's intentions, good or otherwise, I have a problem
with this whole process as described.  Getting a PE to stamp something,
AFTER the fact, AFTER it has been already been designed, is NOT KOSHER, or
at least questionable at best, especially if the PE is not
qualified/experienced with fire protection.  This is a violation of the PE
law in most if not all states, and certainly the spirit of the NICET Code of
Ethics as well.

While it is obvious that Bobby's Company's intentions are good, I am certain
that a LARGE number of contractors out there do not understand the legal
issues involved, and view the need for a PE stamp as just one more obstacle,
one more thing to do to get a permit, just another nuisance cost, and do
exactly what I have described, go and get some PE, any PE that is willing
for a small fee, to stamp their drawings AFTER the FACT.

This is wrong, it is unethical, and illegal for both the PE and the
contractor, and god forbid something happens on one of those jobs, and
everyone gets called to court, or your insurance company finds out.  You
think you're covered, but you're not.  The stamp was obtained illegally, and
therefore your professional liability and errors and omissions coverage is
denied.

This is not another PE vs. layout technician thing. Rather, this is a
statement that if a PE is required, then do it correctly.

Just my 2-cents.  Sorry for the rant, and no offense intended towards Bobby.


Jeff Hewitt, PE, SET, SFPE (Professional Member)
Corporate Engineer
Bi-State Fire Protection Corporation

241 Hughes Lane
St. Charles, MO  63301
636-946-0011
636-946-5172 (fax)
314-574-6989 (cell)

Fire Sprinklers Save lives.
Can You Live Without Them?


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bobby Gillett
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 11:20 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Louisiana Professional of Record question

Lately we have had projects that require us to provide PE stamps. The last
few projects, we were informed after award of contract and before submittal
that we had to have a PE stamp on our drawings. We have a local PE that will
do this, so we send in a change and get him to review and then approve. When
he looks at them he researches the project, design build or not, and makes
sure that everything is done per code before he will sign off. Some of the
projects have a PE on record for the fire protection portion of the project
and still want us to provide a PE stamp before submittal, that's the one
that I do not understand; if they are the engineer of record for the fire
protection on the project, why won't they do like they used to and review
and stamp once it is approved through them? We have even bid a few that
require this in the specs. now - even if the FP portion is engineered from
the beginning.



Bobby Gillett

Sr. Project Manager

Key Fire Protection, Inc.

(731) 424-0130 office  (731) 424-9285 fax

(731) 267-4853 cell

 <mailto:[email protected]>
[email protected]





  _____ 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jeff Hewitt
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 11:06 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Louisiana Professional of Record question



Craig,

Sounds like someone has some "splainin" to do Lucy.

Just because something is done as a design-build project would not somehow
negate the need for a PE.  In fact, just the opposite would hold true.
Design-build implies PE involvement.

In addition, if I was the AHJ, at this point, it is already designed (and
perhaps in for permit and rejected), and now you want to add a PE and come
back with the same design stamped by a PE, I would reject that as well, as
it is obvious the PE just stamped the plans after the fact, and did not do
or supervise the design.

Good luck.

Jeff Hewitt, PE, SET, SFPE (Professional Member)
Corporate Engineer
Bi-State Fire Protection Corporation

241 Hughes Lane
St. Charles, MO  63301
636-946-0011
636-946-5172 (fax)
314-574-6989 (cell)

Fire Sprinklers Save lives.
Can You Live Without Them?

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
[email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 10:02 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Louisiana Professional of Record question

What if it was done by a contractor as a design-build project?  No PE
involved.

Craig L. Prahl, CET 
Fire Protection
CH2MHILL
Lockwood Greene
1500 International Drive
Spartanburg, SC  29304-0491
Direct - 864.599.4102
Fax - 864.599.8439
CH2MHILL Extension  74102
[email protected]



-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dale Wingard
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 8:55 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Louisiana Professional of Record question

Craig,

He has to be a PE.  It is normally the Engineer that is part of the original
design of the project.


Dale F. Wingard, SET
Design Manager
Triple "A" Fire Protection, Inc.
251.649.2034
[email protected]

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
[email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2010 5:22 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Louisiana Professional of Record question

I need to know from someone who regularly works in Louisiana what the
submittal procedure is if drawings are produced for an owner from an outside
design firm who is not the installing contractor.

Is a POR required to be a PE?

Where are the qualifications listed for the POR in relation to sprinkler
shop drawings?

Craig L. Prahl, CET 
Fire Protection
CH2MHILL
Lockwood Greene
1500 International Drive
Spartanburg, SC  29304-0491
Direct - 864.599.4102
Fax - 864.599.8439
CH2MHILL Extension  74102
[email protected]

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

  _____ 

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1170 / Virus Database: 426/3291 - Release Date: 12/01/10

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

  _____  

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1170 / Virus Database: 426/3291 - Release Date: 12/01/10

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected]

To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected]
(Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)

Reply via email to