And when it comes to money, no-one seems able to grasp that for 20% or less than the insurance companies are going to pay out for rebuilding these burned down residential structures every year, we could install fire sprinklers in every new residence built every year. Would this save all those existing structures and losses, no! But it would over time reduce or prevent growth in the number of fatal residential fires. It's a shame the insurance industry isn't pushing harder. Like a variable rate of coverage. ($xx.xx per 1000 of value vs. 2 x $xx.xx per 1000 of value if not sprinklered.)
I'm so tired, so tired of waiting, so tired of waiting for you! Subject: RE: Sprinkler under first accessible landing In PA we seem to be celebrating burnt baby month, and it will remain a tradition forever the way the tide of the Bought in Harrisburg are moving. Sorry its neither new or exciting, but it sure is real. You'd think between 7 kids dying in one fire alone, and the effects of the disasters in Japan being mitigated by the strict building codes, it would be obvious this week (to those that can see beyond a campaign check) that there is value in having building codes to protect the populace. Sorry to be so blunt on a Monday AM, but the reality doesn't go away. The irony just makes the pandering for dollars so much more pathetic. glc _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum For Technical Assistance, send an email to: [email protected] To Unsubscribe, send an email to:[email protected] (Put the word unsubscribe in the subject field)
