It's a holiday week...all references below are from NFPA 25.

-----Original Message-----
From: Johnson, Duane (NIH/OD/ORS) [C] 
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 9:54 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: NFPA 25 standpipe test

...that is 1998 edition of NFPA 25. sorry

-----Original Message-----
From: Johnson, Duane (NIH/OD/ORS) [C] 
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 9:50 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: NFPA 25 standpipe test

You must flow the system demand at time of design (14:6.3.1.3 2008 ed). The 
flow test must occur at the hyd most remote outlets (14:6.3.1.2).  You only 
need to do one flow test per zone (14:6.3.1.1). Your two sections do not 
necessarily mean two zones.

Note also, if this is for Joint Commission, you will need to go back to the old 
codes.  To my knowledge, they are enforcing NFPA 101 2000 edition...this means 
the 1998 edition of NFPA 14 is applicable.

Duane Johnson, PE
Program Manager
Division of the Fire Marshal (Support Contractor) Office of Research Services 
National Institutes of Health
301-496-0487

"Protecting Science - One Sprinkler at a Time"

-----Original Message-----
From: Todd Williams [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 9:15 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: NFPA 25 standpipe test

I am working with a hospital with a total of 9 standpipes. There are standpipes 
that are both pre and post 1993. The original building is partially sprinklered 
and the new section is fully sprinklered. 

1. Is the intent of NFPA 25 that multiple standpipes be flowed simultaneously 
to meet the 1250 gpm demand?

2. Should the two sections of the hospital be flow independent of each other? 

3. If yes to 1 and 2, could the new section be flowed as a fully sprinklered 
building (thus 1000 gpm) as opposed to 1250?

4. How should i handle pipe schedule standpipes, if any exist?

I haven't had to deal with 5 year standpipe tests before.

Todd G. Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
860.535.2080
www.fpdc.com

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

Reply via email to