-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David
Blackwell
Sent: February 23, 2012 6:12 AM
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Classification for ARCADE

The Building Code occupancy class should not be confused with NFPA's
occupancy class in NFPA 13 which I wish they would rename to Hazard
Classification.  NFPA 13 looks at the parameters of the contents that will
burn (quantity, combustibility, storage height, etc.) regardless of the
human use, number of occupants, height of building, etc.

Let's not judge helpful appendix generalizations of typical occupancy class
with the need for the designer to properly classify the system based upon
the factors that a fire will see, not accounting for what humans will call
it under the IBC...  


Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 21, 2012, at 1:01 PM, "Ralphy Henderson" <[email protected]>
wrote:

> This is a group A4 / B occupancy - I wouldn't even begin to look in the
storage section unless it were a group S or had some back room with rack
storage. I'm thinking Ordinary Group II would be a good call.
> 
> --- On Tue, 2/21/12, Ron Greenman <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> From: Ron Greenman <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Classification for ARCADE
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Tuesday, February 21, 2012, 3:24 PM
> 
> Are we supposed to look at the contents of all buildings as if they 
> were storage facilities? If so then why would we need any other 
> occupancies other than S? I'd guess the average office has more 
> combustibles per square foot than a large appliance store and yet.... 
> An arcade seems to me to be more like a store, or perhaps a nightclub 
> (dimly lit, loud noises, distracting lights, limited egress, transient 
> population, sans alcohol) than it does a warehouse.
> 
> 
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 7:12 AM, Roland Huggins
> <[email protected]>wrote:
> 
>> seems a tad conservative when you compare it to the amount of fuel 
>> presented by the plastic in an office space.  I'd look more at the 
>> overall density and  not just the height of some amount of the plastic.
>> 
>> Roland
>> 
>> 
>> On Feb 20, 2012, at 4:14 PM, Ralphy Henderson wrote:
>> 
>>   Hey all,
>>> 
>>> I have an arcade I'm working on and started wondering what 
>>> classification this would fall under. I was thinking ordinary 1 or 2 
>>> - with a leaning towards 2 because of the plastics involved in the 
>>> typical arcade game @ about 5-6ft. high... what do you all think?
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was 
>>> scrubbed...
>>> URL: <http://fireball.**firesprinkler.org/mailman/**
>>> private/sprinklerforum/**attachments/20120220/e1cca0e0/**attachment.
>>> html<http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/private/sprinklerforu
>>> m/attachments/20120220/e1cca0e0/attachment.html>
>>>> 
>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>> Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.**org 
>>> <[email protected]>
>>> http://fireball.firesprinkler.**org/mailman/listinfo/**sprinklerforu
>>> m<http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum>
>>> 
>> 
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> Sprinklerforum@firesprinkler.**org <[email protected]>
>> http://fireball.firesprinkler.**org/mailman/listinfo/**sprinklerforum
>> <http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum>
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Ron Greenman
> Instructor
> Fire Protection Engineering Technology Bates Technical College
> 1101 So. Yakima Ave.
> Tacoma, WA 98405
> 
> [email protected]
> 
> http://www.bates.ctc.edu/fireprotection/
> 
> 253.680.7346
> 253.576.9700 (cell)
> 
> Member:
> ASEE, SFPE, ASCET, NFPA, AFSA, NFSA, AFAA, NIBS, WSAFM, WFC
> 
> They are happy men whose natures sort with their vocations. -Francis 
> Bacon, essayist, philosopher, and statesman (1561-1626)
> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was 
> scrubbed...
> URL: 
> <http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/private/sprinklerforum/atta
> chments/20120221/c567e0c2/attachment.html>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was 
> scrubbed...
> URL: 
> <http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/private/sprinklerforum/atta
> chments/20120221/020258f1/attachment.html>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

Reply via email to