Until solid statistical evidence
is produced, I guess we are reduced
to little more than opinions and
speculation... relegated
to tossing events and outliers from
the database, into the rubbish bin
sample space as non-sequiturs
and one off examples.

But there seem some ripe applications for occupant hose streams.

Most unsprinklered work places are an obvious choice.

Older unsprinklered apartment buildings are another; though if derelicts

abuse these hose stations, then they should be

punished (with severity on parity with impairing life safety)

and not the building owners who provide the hose.  There are issues

of educating occupants to the exponential growth of fires, and

the risk of getting burned, but if we have so few stories involving

fire saves using occupant hose, how much fewer are the stories

of occupants getting hurt during fire hose operations?  If we are

so adamant about reducing fire risk to occupants, why then are we

repealing residential sprinkler ordinances?


It would be welcomed, if statistics proved that occupant hose

streams are a fool's dream in all or even most applications,

but until then, my common sense says America lost some

serious mojo over its small hose issue.




scot deal
excelsior fire


*Factory Mutual Data Sheet 8-9*

*§ 3.2 Loss History*

*July 2011 *


The use of hoses use was identified in 87% of the incidents that operated

ten or fewer sprinklers and, when hoses were used, they were applied

either before sprinklers operated or before fire control was achieved in

a little more than 50% of the cases. This strong correlation suggests early

application of hose streams has a significant effect on the average number

of sprinklers that operate in rack storage fires (it would follow that this
is

also true for solid-piled / palletized storage fires), and that provision
of

small hose stations is a key element in the overall protection scheme.

It is impossible to say how many catastrophic fires may have been

prevented by early intervention using hoses.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/private/sprinklerforum/attachments/20120612/23e08fba/attachment.html>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

Reply via email to