The pump is sized for other hazards on the site with greater demand than this 
particular area.  This area is small and the demand represents less than 40% of 
the actual pump rating.

Yes the pump is existing.

As far as graphing the curve, it's a matter of plugging in numbers in a 
dialogue box in the calc program.

Craig L. Prahl, CET   
Fire Protection 
CH2MHILL
Lockwood Greene
1500 International Drive
Spartanburg, SCĀ  29304-0491
Direct - 864.599.4102
Fax - 864.599.8439
CH2MHILL Extension  74102
[email protected]



-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Aaron Peck
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 11:52 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Using points on the pump curve for calculations

Only thing I can think of its an existing fire pump and the design requires 
below the 50% so he didn't want to show the whole curve. Am I correct that the 
fire pump is existing or something similar?

Because if the pump is being put In by them it's rated much higher then the 
demand, I'm assuming. Or other case maybe it's sized large for a future 
expansion that will require a fire pump that size.

In either case the fire pump curve is maybe to much to graph with a low demand.

Aaron M. Peck SET
NICET IV (Fire)
+1 (202) 407-9079 Skype
+855 (78) 700-407 Cellphone
Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 8, 2013, at 22:46, John Denhardt <[email protected]> wrote:

> Where is the calculation demand point?  I like using the point near my 
> demand condition,
> 
> John August Denhardt, P.E., FSFPE
> Strickland Fire Protection Incorporated
> 5113 Berwyn Road
> College Park, Maryland 20740
> Office Telephone Number:  301-474-1136 Mobile Telephone Number:  
> 301-343-1457 FIRE SPRINKLERS SAVE LIVES - Can you live without them?
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
> [email protected]
> Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 11:44 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Using points on the pump curve for calculations
> 
> Got a calculation I'm reviewing where the designer used the fire pump 50% 
> test point for his calculations and plugged it in as the City water supply 
> info.   The water source for the fire pump is an aboveground suction tank.
> 
> I've not done this and was always taught that when a fire pump was used you 
> used the fire pump churn, rated and 150% values in the calculation for your 
> water source.  
> 
> Any thoughts, did I miss a memo on a new or other way to calc when using a 
> fire pump?
> 
> Craig L. Prahl, CET   
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkl
> er.org _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkl
> er.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to