Thanks Marc. I was able to scour the office and came up with the 2010
handbook. I see it does allow me to omit 1 level from the calculations.

Mike Hill


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Sprinkler Design Services
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2013 1:01 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Sprinklers Below Overhead Doors

Mike,

If you have the handbook for 2007, the commentary text elaborates that the
intent of 22.4.4.6.3 extends to permanent or temporary obstructions,
specifically mentioning overhead garage doors.

Marc Walter
Sprinkler Design Services

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike
Hill
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2013 9:33 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Sprinklers Below Overhead Doors

Question: Are sprinklers below overhead doors required to be included in
hydraulic calculations?

When I first started in the industry, I was told that heads below overhead
doors were required to be included in the hydraulic calculations. The reason
being, it was a temporary obstruction. The door could be up or down if a
fire broke out, unlike a large duct which was a permanent obstruction.

I was recently questioned by a FPE as to why I included heads below the door
in a hydraulic calculation. I explained my reasoning to him and he accepted
it. In his eyes I had proven a more demanding situation than was needed so
it didn't affect his stamping the plans. Flash forward a few weeks and to a
different project. I now have a much larger operating area and removing
these (11) heads from the calculation would help it greatly. I am providing
protection for a firehouse expansion on a military base. This calculation is
in the apparatus bay. UFC requirements are in effect, ceiling height over
20'-0" and it is sloped enough to require the 30% increase. The majority of
the piping being calculated is existing and to remain as is (if at all
possible).

Using 2007 Edition of NFPA-13 (only one I have handy at the moment).
8.5.5.3.1 Specifically mentions overhead doors need protection below. No
problem here.

22.2.2.6.3 Does not mention overhead doors when providing situations where
sprinklers can be omitted from hydraulic calculations. 

The wording in these sections seems to support what my mentors instilled in
my soft pliable mind all those years ago.

What says the forum?

Mike Hill



_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to