If it is not required by code, but you still need to submit to someone for 
approval, you can pursue the alternative means and methods as an approach for 
acceptance. However, in the design documents it needs to be clearly defined 
what the exact purpose and function of the system will be.  

We've had special systems requested by owner's loss prevention groups but since 
they did not comply with recognized Codes and Standards, they were not 
identified as a fire suppression or fire control systems and with that in mind 
they were also not constrained to meet any requirements within those codes or 
standards.  Call it a tank cooling spray system or whatever you wish but due to 
the non-compliance to NFPA 15, don't call it anything that would give an 
impression that it's for anything other than your intended purpose.   All 
parties involved need to understand the limitations and function and sign off 
on the concept.  Also don't put any notes about installing per NFPA 15 or NFPA 
13, as that can lead to confusion on the intent.

Remember, all you're doing here is cooling, not suppression.  Once you have 
ignition it's just a controlled burn from there on out.  

Craig L. Prahl, CET   



-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Todd - Work
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 10:22 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: non required system

I have been asked to look at a new installation of 2 propane tanks at a small 
distribution facility. The size of the tanks is such that they do not require 
any protection by Code. However, the local Fire Marshal would like a water 
spray system. The owner has agreed to install it. However, there is no public 
water supply at this facility and what the Fire Marshal would like is a system 
connected to an FDC several hundred feet away. This would not be acceptable per 
NFPA 15 which requires an automatic water supply. That being said, it does have 
merit in that it would allow the fire department to get water on a fire in a 
potentially volatile situation from a relatively safe distance. Any thoughts on 
the best way to proceed with this? I'm thinking get a variance from the State 
Fire Marshal and go ahead with it, but have some reservations about doing non 
conforming systems.

Todd G Williams, PE
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
Stonington, CT
www.fpdc.com
860-535-2080 (ofc)
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to