I don't know what the design basis was, but it looks like we need the automatic 
fill to maintain the head pressure, so probably not.

On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 8:20 AM, Brad Casterline <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Karen,
> Sorry about the superfluous talk about fire- I was watching it all play out
> in my mind (fast forwarded because 2 hours is a long time)- but this is
> interesting in that the fill rate is equal to the discharge rate, so it is
> no different than a city water flow test, except you need a fire pump for
> pressure.
> Was the water storage tank capacity arrived at based on system demand for 2
> hours, with no consideration of automatic fill?
> Brad
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brad Casterline [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 9:14 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: 2 hour fire water supply
> I see accidental fires, Sprinklered or not, going through three phases:
> erratic growth, somewhat steady burning, then some sort of decay. If you
> look at what might be the lowest water level in the tank over two hours
> would be you could get an idea of what the minimum pressures at the
> sprinklers would be.
>> On Jun 12, 2014, at 9:01 PM, Brad Casterline <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>> 
>> Probably not since there is a difference between the total capacity and
> the available head at any one instant in time?
>> 
>>> On Jun 12, 2014, at 8:40 PM, Karen Lesko <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> When evaluating fire water supply to ensure there is a 2 hour supply, do
> I
>>> have to take the head pressure loss of the fire water tank level drop
> into
>>> account over the 2 hours?  The tank has makeup from wells that have
> normal
>>> and back-up power, and the well makeup into the fire water tank equals
> the
>>> output of the fire pump.
>>> 
>>> Thank you in advance,
>>> 
>>> Karen Lesko
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to