I'll play devil's advocate:

It may be allowed up to 24" as indicated in NFPA 13 (2013) Section 6.3.1.1.1* 
which states " Underground pipe shall be permitted to extend into the building 
through the slab or wall not more than 24 in. (0.6 m)."  The annex for this 
section states "Extending the underground pipe into a building provides working 
room to transition to the appropriate aboveground piping. Environmental 
conditions should be considered as outlined in 24.1.6.1.2."  Section 24.1.6.1.2 
states, "The transition piece shall be protected against possible damage from 
corrosive agents, solvent attack, or mechanical damage."

But will the piping withstand fire potential in the riser room?  What about the 
pressure classification of the piping which is highly dependent upon 
temperature per AWWA C900 per the temperature coefficients in Table 3 (50% 
reduction in pressure rating at 110°F).  Is the correct pressure classification 
of this piping being used?  Is there sufficient restraint at the penetration 
through the floor slab to withstand the forces of Poisson's Ratio such that the 
header and riser located above the stub-in and connected to it will not be 
unintentionally stress-loaded in a way to cause downstream component failure or 
leakage?  AWWA C605 which governs installation of PVC pipe is titled 
"Underground Installation of PVC..."  There is no aboveground installation 
guide that I am aware of.  Will the manufacturer stand behind this 
installation?  Is the piping still UL listed or FM approved when installed this 
way?  The cited article makes no mention of this.

Several manufacturers of PVC and HDPE state these piping products are "... 
Factory Mutual Approved for underground installation only."  Acceptable 
approved 'In-building Riser' fittings are made for this 
application...specifically with a female end for bell and spigot 
connections...why not use one of them?  'Working room to transition' as 
indicated in Section A.6.3.1.1.1 can be accomplished below grade and not under 
footings by qualified entities wherein the possibility of catastrophic failure 
for the entire suppression system is mitigated with placing the transition 
below grade and at the same time non-metallic piping manufacturers' listing 
limitations are maintained.

Ryan L. Hinson, PE*, SET**  \  Burns & McDonnell
Senior Fire Protection Engineer
O 952-656-3662 \  M 320-250-5404  \  F 952-229-2923
[email protected]  \  burnsmcd.com
8201 Norman Center Drive, Suite 300  \  Bloomington, MN 55437
*Registered in: MN & TX
**NICET IV - Water-Based Systems Layout


-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Richard Carr
Sent: Friday, October 02, 2015 11:34 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: PVC (C900) for spigot through floor

YES, it is allowed. Article in Sprinkler Age by Phill Brown.

Richard Carr, SET
Branch Manager
Cox Fire Protection, Inc
6555 Grace Lane.
Jacksonville, Fl. 32205
[email protected]
904-781-8227


-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Friday, October 02, 2015 12:29 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: PVC (C900) for spigot through floor

Good morning,
Is it permissible to install PVC (C900) as the spigot piece through the floor 
slab of a building?  There would be about 6 to 8" of exposed piping.  All I can 
find in the 2013 edition of 13 is that Fire Resistance of the Pipe shall be 
considered (10.1.4 (1)).

It appears that this wording has been done away with in the 2016 edition and 
replaced with this, "Where piping installed in a private fire service main must 
be installed above grade, the piping materials shall conform to NFPA 13". 

Based on this, it looks to me like using PVC through the floor will be 
acceptable moving forward.  Is this correct?

Thanks for the help,

 
Bob Knight, CET III 
208-318-3057 
www.firebyknight.com
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to