If the density didn't changed how did the hazard change?  Although at 0.45 with 
5.6 do you have a sprinkler system or a mist system, lol.

Chris Cahill, PE*
Associate Fire Protection Engineer 
Burns & McDonnell
Phone:  952.656.3652
Fax:  952.229.2923
[email protected]
www.burnsmcd.com
*Registered in: MN


Proud to be #14 on FORTUNE's 2014 List of 100 Best Companies to Work For

-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Steve Leyton
Sent: Friday, October 02, 2015 2:29 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Existing sprinklers


    
Hitting a wall how? I Thing The AHJ is on point, unless there's something else 
to the story.

Steve Leyton

-------- Original message --------
From: James Crawford <[email protected]>
Date: 10/02/2015  2:01 PM  (GMT-06:00)
To: [email protected]
Subject: Existing sprinklers 

We have a building that was built about 30 years ago the sprinkler system was 
designed to NFPA 231C with a ceiling density of 0.45 gpm over 2000 square feet. 
There is good water pressure and the sprinkler heads are 5.6K and 286°F

 

We have a new tenant and they require 0.45/2000 and the AHJ says the heads need 
to be changed to 11.2K because the density is above 0.34, I said that NFPA 25 
(2008ed) section 4.1.6 Addressing Changes in Hazard, indicates that the system 
needs to be evaluated and if the system provides the required protection then 
no changes are required.

 

Comments please I seem to be hitting a wall.

 

 

Thank you

 

 

James Crawford

Phaser Fire Protection Ltd.

Phone  604-888-0318

Fax 604-888-4732

Cel 604-790-0938

Email  [email protected]

 

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to