I was also picturing a low profile close to ceiling fan.
We don't see a lot of the hung by rod type fans any more.
Its always in the details.

Good discussion though.

Mark

From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Bob
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2017 4:48 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: QR STANDARD SPRAY SPRINKLERS

Funny, I was picturing a ceiling mounted unit.  Details do matter, don't they?

Thank you,

Bob Knight, CET III
208-318-3057

From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Travis Mack, SET
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2017 2:44 PM
To: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: QR STANDARD SPRAY SPRINKLERS


I was picturing a fan on a down rod so that the motor is below the sprinkler.  
Therefore, you would be able to throw on all sides of it.  As always, the 
details always matter :-)

Travis Mack, SET

MFP Design, LLC

2508 E Lodgepole Drive

Gilbert, AZ 85298

480-505-9271

fax: 866-430-6107

email:[email protected]<mailto:email:[email protected]>



http://www.mfpdesign.com

https://www.facebook.com/pages/MFP-Design-LLC/92218417692

Send large files to us via: https://www.hightail.com/u/MFPDesign

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/travismack
On 1/23/2017 2:35 PM, Bob wrote:
Travis,
My understanding of this exception as you are explaining it is that it only 
applies when you are able to throw water both over and under the obstruction.
When this first was introduced, I think in the 2002 ed., everybody cheered and 
thought that we could ignore nonstructural obstructions, but it was pretty 
quickly addressed in webinars by AFSA and the *FSA that this wasn't the case.  
At the time, I remember it being qualified that the intent wasn't to "hide" 
sprinklers but to make it more flexible when the intent of over and under was 
meet.  You might be able to make the case with ceiling fan housing, but I know 
of several jurisdictions that won't allow it.  You either meet the 3x rule or 
you add an additional sprinkler.

Just a little bit more fodder for the fire.

Thank you,

Bob Knight, CET III
208-318-3057

From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Travis Mack
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2017 2:25 PM
To: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: QR STANDARD SPRAY SPRINKLERS

For a twist: Yes, you would follow 3x rule. However, it is likely light hazard 
with ceiling fan. So, since it is non-structural, do you have to follow it?

I think prudent design is to be the 3x away with QR sprinklers. However, it 
could be ignored since it is non-structural.

I typically see residential or ex cov sprinklers in these situations and that 
forces you to the 4x rule. Plus the allowance for non-structural is only for 
standard spray sprinklers.
Travis Mack, SET
MFP Design, LLC
"Follow" us on Facebook: 
https://www.facebook.com/pages/MFP-Design-LLC/92218417692
Send large files to MFP Design via:
https://www.hightail.com/u/MFPDesign

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 23, 2017, at 2:10 PM, Mark Phillips 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
NFPA 13 2013 ED 8.6.5.2.1.3 (A)

From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Trillium Fire Sprinkler Design Inc.
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2017 4:06 PM
To: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: RE: QR STANDARD SPRAY SPRINKLERS

CAN YOU REFERENCE A CODE FOR ME?

From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Mark Phillips
Sent: January-23-17 4:05 PM
To: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: RE: QR STANDARD SPRAY SPRINKLERS

Three times rule applies to the fan housing unit (motor)

From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Trillium Fire Sprinkler Design Inc.
Sent: Monday, January 23, 2017 3:56 PM
To: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: QR STANDARD SPRAY SPRINKLERS

I KNOW FOR 13R YOU NEED TO BE A MINIMUM OF 3'-0" AWAY FROM THE CENTER OF A 
CEILING FAN WITH RESIDENTIAL HEADS

I CANNOT FIND WHERE THE SAME APPLIES FOR A 13 SYSTEM USING STANDARD Q.R. 
PENDENT OR CONCEALED HEADS.

CAN SOMEONE VERIFY OR EDUCATED ME ON THIS PLEASE?

THANKS
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org



_______________________________________________

Sprinklerforum mailing list

[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to