Of course, that should have been GPM and not PSI.
Steve -------- Original message -------- From: Steve Leyton <[email protected]> Date: 2/19/17 8:44 AM (GMT-08:00) To: [email protected], Vince Sabolik <[email protected]> Subject: RE: K for a Hose Valve Awesome. So the "nominal" flow at 100 PSI will be 1,138.5 PSI? Maybe we need to change the hydraulic design method in the standard. Steve L. -------- Original message -------- From: Brad Casterline <[email protected]> Date: 2/19/17 2:09 AM (GMT-08:00) To: Vince Sabolik <[email protected]>, [email protected] Subject: Re: K for a 2½" Hose Valve K=113.85 In the same way that a nominal 1/2" sprinkler with a Coefficient of Discharge of .75 has a K=5.6, a nominal 2.5" hose valve with a Coefficient of Discharge of .61 has a K=113.85. Brad On Feb 17, 2017 8:28 AM, "Vince Sabolik" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Good morning, everyone... Does anybody have a decent K Factor for a 2½" hose valve? Thanks! Vince [cid:[email protected]] 11351 Pearl Road / Suite 101 Strongsville, Ohio 44136 Phone 440 238-4800<tel:(440)%20238-4800> Fax 440 238-4876<tel:(440)%20238-4876> Cell 440 724-7601<tel:(440)%20724-7601> Vince Sabolik _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
