You also need to be very careful to review the wording in -13 [11.3.1.3] which discharge from residential sprinklers must be the _*GREATER*_ of:

 * that required by the minimum flow rates in the listing
 * in rooms > 800 ft² deliver a density of 0.1 over the design area per
   8.5.2.1
 * in rooms < 800 ft² deliver a density of 0.1 over the room or
   compartment divided by the number of sprinklers in the room - the
   small room rule

That _*GREATER*_ of text has been responsible for a couple of hasty revisions to plans on my part.

food for thought,

*Ken Wagoner, SET
*Parsley Consulting***
*350 West 9th Avenue, Suite 206
*Escondido, California 92025
*****Phone 760-745-6181*
Visit our website <http://www.parsleyconsulting.com/> ***
On 03/01/2017 9:41 AM, Ed Kramer wrote:

Correct, and that is helpful. A lot depends on the sprink/piping layout. As others have pointed out, the difference in pipe size normally isn’t much. Just finished a project where the main down the corridor had to be 2.5” to make residential sprinks work. Was able to reduce it to 2” when we switched the design to QR. The primary reason was back-to-back sidewall sprinks in the demising walls combined with a marginal water supply – if the water supply had been better, a 2” main would have worked for the residential sprinks also. Just another tool to have in the toolbox.

Ed Kramer

Bamford Fire

*From:*Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Travis Mack
*Sent:* Wednesday, March 01, 2017 10:51 AM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: Dwelling Unit Sprinkler Calc

You can use small room rule and do room area divided by number of heads to get 0.1 flow. Then compare that to data sheet.

Travis Mack, SET

MFP Design, LLC

"Follow" us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pages/MFP-Design-LLC/92218417692

Send large files to MFP Design via:

https://www.hightail.com/u/MFPDesign

Sent from my iPhone


On Mar 1, 2017, at 9:43 AM, Ed Kramer <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    I agree – 4 heads regardless of walls, even if the walls are
    rated.  It creates a bit of a penalty when using residential
    sprinks.  I understand the reasoning back when we didn’t provide a
    .10 density, but not so much now.   Sometimes I’ve found it’s more
    economical to switch to QR sprinks and then utilize the room
    design method.  Just depends on the particulars of your layout.

    Ed Kramer

    Bamford Fire

    *From:*Sprinklerforum
    [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf
    Of *Travis Mack
    *Sent:* Wednesday, March 01, 2017 10:17 AM
    *To:* [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Subject:* Re: Dwelling Unit Sprinkler Calc

    It is regardless of walls. I pick 4 on one line if they are the
    most demanding. If unsure, just throw on a few calc areas and take
    the most demanding one. (Another plug for Autosprink - draw the
    extra remote areas. Tell it to keep most demanding and you are done).

    Travis Mack, SET

    MFP Design, LLC

    "Follow" us on Facebook:
    https://www.facebook.com/pages/MFP-Design-LLC/92218417692

    Send large files to MFP Design via:

    https://www.hightail.com/u/MFPDesign

    Sent from my iPhone


    On Mar 1, 2017, at 9:05 AM, Dewayne Martinez
    <[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        NFPA 13 (10) section 11.3.1.1 also includes “adjacent”. What
        does this mean actually?  4 heads on the same line regardless
        of the walls or 4 heads in the same area but may be supplied
        from different lines?  The pictures in the appendix are not
        very clear.

        Thanks,

        Dewayne

        *From:*Sprinklerforum
        [mailto:[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>] *On
        Behalf Of *[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        *Sent:* Friday, July 08, 2016 9:13 AM
        *To:* sprinklerforum
        *Subject:* Re: Dwelling Unit Sprinkler Calc

        In response to the original question, is it just me or are we
        over-thinking this?

        NFPA 13 says that when using residential heads, you calculate
        the 4 heads that produce the greatest hydraulic demand.  No
        mention of units, rated walls, corridors, type of
        construction, etc.

        I didn't know George Church, but I would have liked him.

        ------------------------------------------------------------------------

        *From: *"Travis Mack" <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>>
        *To: *[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>,
        "sprinklerforum" <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>>
        *Sent: *Tuesday, July 5, 2016 3:44:35 PM
        *Subject: *Re: Dwelling Unit Sprinkler Calc

        I'd probably grab the adjacent sprinkler in the adjacent room.

        Travis Mack, SET

        MFP Design, LLC

        "Follow" us on Facebook:
        https://www.facebook.com/pages/MFP-Design-LLC/92218417692

        Send large files to MFP Design via:

        https://www.hightail.com/u/MFPDesign

        Sent from my iPhone


        On Jul 5, 2016, at 12:34 PM, Bob <[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

            I have a NFPA 13 building with Dwelling Units.  They each
            have three Residential Sprinklers.  13 requires a four
            head calc. Can I calc the 3 residential sprinklers and
            pick up one QR sprinkler in the corridor and still satisfy
            the 4 head requirement?  Or, should I pick up one
            residential sprinkler from an adjacent dwelling room?

            Thank you,

            Bob Knight, CET III

            208-318-3057

            <image002.jpg>

            _______________________________________________
            Sprinklerforum mailing list
            [email protected]
            <mailto:[email protected]>
            
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org


        _______________________________________________
        Sprinklerforum mailing list
        [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

        _______________________________________________
        Sprinklerforum mailing list
        [email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>
        
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

    _______________________________________________
    Sprinklerforum mailing list
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org



_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to