Roland?   Ray Lambert are you out there?

This is a LONG-simmering topic of discussion the AFSA tech dept. and also the 
NFPA community.   Short answer is NO, you do not have to include any HSA for 
standpipe connections.

My opinion only (after Roland branded it on my a**).

Steve L.

From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Kyle.Montgomery
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 3:36 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: NFPA 13 8.17.5.2.2(1)

I'm wondering why it isn't more common, considering you purchase about half as 
many PRVs that way.

Would you need to flow a hose allowance through that valve as part of you 
sprinkler calculation?

From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Steve Leyton
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 3:21 PM
To: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: NFPA 13 8.17.5.2.2(1)

It's not the most common arrangement but a common pressure reducing valve on 
the supply side of the floor control and hose connection for a combined 
standpipe is acceptable so long as it all works hydraulically.

The foregoing is my opinion only and is not intended to represent the NFPA 14 
Technical Committee, nor serve as an interpretation of the standard.

Steve Leyton
Protection Design & Consulting
San Diego, CA






From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Kyle.Montgomery
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 3:19 PM
To: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: RE: NFPA 13 8.17.5.2.2(1)

Not to sidetrack this thread... but is the arrangement Colin is describing 
acceptable? I have never found anything in the code saying it isn't, but I 
would say that almost every installation I've seen has a separate 
pressure-reducing hose valve and pressure-reducing system control valve... 
which is obviously more expensive.


From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Colin Carew (Cambridge)
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 2:10 PM
To: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] NFPA 13 8.17.5.2.2(1)


Wondering ,  what is reason behind the Control valve and check valve of the 
same size at the connection is required per 13 8.17.5.2.2 (1)


I have a connection , where I connect to the standpipe  with 2.5" pipe and then 
 to a PRV control valve , then after I feed a standard hose valve and reduce 
down to 2" for my sprinkler control valve assembly .


Thanks .


Colin Carew

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to