Scott,
Based on the material which was presented to the -24 and -291 committee
meetings I believed the proposed safety margin and the means to
calculate that margin there was some merit in the proposal.
For reasons I don't quite remember the PI was voted down at the 2nd
draft meeting. I listened to some of the discussion, and there were
some good points made. I'm not terribly surprised it failed at the
convention level. Perhaps the attendees were following the lead of the
technical committees, and declining to overrule their decision.
sincerely,
*Ken Wagoner, SET
*Parsley Consulting***
*350 West 9th Avenue, Suite 206
*Escondido, California 92025
*****Phone 760-745-6181*
Visit the website <http://www.parsleyconsulting.com/> ***
On 06/15/2018 8:09 AM, Scott Futrell wrote:
Only that the 'safety margin' inclusion in the 2019 edition of NFPA 13 failed,
so it won't be included or required.
I consider this unfortunate, but I'd guess that not everyone on the forum would
agree.
Scott
Office: (763) 425-1001 x2
Cell: (612) 759-5556
-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2018 5:46 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: NFPA Vegas Convention
I didn't make it again this year.
"Caputo" is the only speaker name I recognized.
Anybody have any earthshaking epiphanies?
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
