I’d compare this to 13-D test. I’d tell new inspectors to view it as more of a 
leak test.

Not two hours. But best if water is on a little while so leakers show before 
cover.

Best.

Bruce Verhei 

> On Jun 28, 2018, at 14:27, bcasterl...@fsc-inc.com wrote:
> 
> Mike,
> 
> I would not infer 2 hours period based on the definition of hydrostatic test 
> in chapter three-- specified pressure for specified time. For new it is 200 
> psi/2hrs. For remodel it is working psi/not specified.
> 
> Disclaimer:
> This is me talking.
> :)
> 
> Brad
> 
> Quoting Mike B Morey <mmo...@shambaugh.com>:
> 
>> Colleagues:
>> We were recently discussing the hydrostatic test requirements of a head
>> relocate job and I stumbled on to a question.  In the two exceptions for
>> modifications under 20 sprinklers and modifications that can't be isolated
>> such as relocating drops, it says they "require testing at system working
>> pressure".  Is it inferred that they also require a 2 hour test period? In
>> the past I know I've worked with clients as a contractor where we did a
>> working pressure test by simply isolating the system, walking the affected
>> area to look for leaks, and then checking back at the riser to ensure no
>> drop in pressure without necessarily sticking to a specific amount of
>> time.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Mike Morey
>> CFPS 3229 • NICET S.E.T. 123677
>> Project Manager • Fire Protection Group
>> Shambaugh & Son, LP an EMCOR Company
>> 7614 Opportunity Drive • Fort Wayne, IN • 46825
>> direct 260.487.7824 /  cell 260.417.0625 /  fax 260.487.7991
>> email mmo...@shambaugh.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain 
>> confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No 
>> confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission.  If 
>> you receive this message in error, please  immediately delete it and all 
>> copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the 
>> sender.  You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, 
>> print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended 
>> recipient.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to