Interesting. I don't have access to a copy of the Code and Commentary.
Would you be able to copy/paste the relevant section, or tell me where to
find it? I will try to get access to it.
Thanks.

On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 12:35 PM Prahl, Craig/GVL <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Nope, the omission of sprinklers by any means or allowances null and voids
> the “sprinklered throughout” classification.  That is addressed within
> the IBC Commentary.  Just had this discussion on a project myself.
>
>
>
> It is the same if you substitute a clean agent for sprinklers in an area.
> No longer considered sprinklered throughout.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Craig Prahl | Jacobs | Group Lead/SME – Fire Protection | 864.676.5252 |
> [email protected] | www.jacobs.com
>
> 1041 East Butler Road   Greenville, South Carolina  29606
>
>
>
> *From:* Sprinklerforum <[email protected]> *On
> Behalf Of *James Litvak via Sprinklerforum
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 24, 2019 12:18 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Cc:* James Litvak <[email protected]>
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Trying to determine hydrant locations per IFC,
> wondering how sprinkler coverage omissions will affect distances.
>
>
>
> I'm working on a manufacturing facility that is building type IIB. Per the
> fire-flow requirement of 8,000 gpm, the average spacing of hydrants will
> need to be 200 feet, per IFC Table C102.1. However, note f will allow a
> 50-percent spacing increase if "the building is equipped *throughout* with
> an automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 of the 
> *International
> Fire Code*" (emphasis mine). The reason I bolded throughout is because
> approximately 2/3 of the building has sprinklers omitted in accordance with
> exceptions from Section 903.3.1.1. So my question is, if Section 903.3.1.1
> is being followed such that it is being applied throughout the building,
> and the areas of the building that aren't being sprinklered are allowed by
> that section, does this count as "equipped throughout"?
>
> ------------------------------
>
> NOTICE - This communication may contain confidential and privileged
> information that is for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any
> viewing, copying or distribution of, or reliance on this message by
> unintended recipients is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message
> and deleting it from your computer.
>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to