AIL? Address it later?

Best.

> On Jan 15, 2020, at 11:06, Ben Young via Sprinklerforum 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> VIF verify in field
> 
>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 3:49 PM BILL MENSTER via Sprinklerforum 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> NTS. (not too sure)
>>> On January 14, 2020 at 3:08 PM Steve Leyton via Sprinklerforum 
>>> <[email protected]> wrote: 
>>> 
>>> My FAVORITE things to put on shop drawings (because it drove our spoiled 
>>> union fitters CRAZY) was to write GOE or TOE on an over-cut piece of pipe.  
>>>  If we were in a big hurry and had no real idea of where or how to start 
>>> resolving an issue, I’d use VIF (verify in field).   That was always good 
>>> for a phone call …
>>> 
>>> Steve L.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> From: Sprinklerforum 
>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
>>> Kyle.Montgomery via Sprinklerforum
>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 12:03 PM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Cc: Kyle.Montgomery; Bruce Verhei
>>> Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: NFPA 13, 23.1.3 (37)
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Are you familiar with the term ‘C.O.J.’?
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Heheheh…
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Just in case you aren’t, it’s not dirty or anything. It means “cut on job”.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> -Kyle M
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> From: Sprinklerforum 
>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bruce 
>>> Verhei via Sprinklerforum
>>> Sent: Monday, January 13, 2020 7:42 PM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Cc: Bruce Verhei <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: NFPA 13, 23.1.3 (37)
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> I’ve never drawn up a fab order. I always assumed you’d need this 
>>> information. Do I get it wrong. 
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Best.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Bruce Verhei 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Jan 13, 2020, at 06:15, Prahl, Craig/GVL via Sprinklerforum 
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I’m curious why there is any confusion over this?  
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Example: If you have sprinklers on sprigs and don’t provide any elevation 
>>> information, the shop drawing reviewer or permit reviewer will have to 
>>> calculate the fitting takeouts and sprig lengths to be sure your sprinkler 
>>> is within the allowable dimensions from the deck.  Without piping 
>>> elevations how will the crew know where the pipe is supposed to be routed 
>>> so that it doesn’t run into every other system that’s in the same space?
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> When reviewing calculations, having elevations shown on the drawing that 
>>> correlate to the calcs helps verify that the design depicted on drawings 
>>> and in the calcs actually match.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Dimensions are great too as well as building column lines for reference.  
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Craig Prahl | Jacobs | Group Lead/SME – Fire Protection | 864.676.5252 | 
>>> [email protected] | www.jacobs.com
>>> 
>>> 1041 East Butler Road   Greenville, South Carolina  29606
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> From: Sprinklerforum <[email protected]> On 
>>> Behalf Of Sprinkler Academy - C Bilbo via Sprinklerforum
>>> Sent: Thursday, January 9, 2020 6:10 PM
>>> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
>>> Cc: Sprinkler Academy - C Bilbo <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: NFPA 13, 23.1.3 (37)
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Bob,
>>> The committee wants to see relative elevation changes.  This helps with 
>>> lengths of pipe and calcs too.
>>> We use the word relative because it doesn't need to be Above Sea Level.
>>> (But I think you already know this!!)
>>> 
>>> Cecil
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> It should be recognized that the above is my opinion as a member of the 
>>> NFPA, and has not been processed as a formal interpretation in accordance 
>>> with the NFPA Regulations Governing Committee Projects and should therefore 
>>> not be considered, nor relied upon, as the official position of the the 
>>> NFPA, nor any of their technical committees.
>>> 
>>> Sincerely,
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Cecil Bilbo
>>> Academy of Fire Sprinkler Technology
>>> Champaign, IL
>>> 217.607.0325
>>> www.sprinkleracademy.com
>>> [email protected]
>>> ??
>>> OUR STUDENTS SAVE LIVES!!
>>> 
>>> From: Sprinklerforum <[email protected]> on 
>>> behalf of Bob Knight via Sprinklerforum 
>>> <[email protected]>
>>> Sent: Thursday, January 9, 2020 3:41:36 PM
>>> To: [email protected] 
>>> <[email protected]>
>>> Cc: Bob Knight <[email protected]>
>>> Subject: NFPA 13, 23.1.3 (37)
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> From NFPA 13 (2013 ED), 23.1.3 (37)  Relative  elevations  of  sprinklers,  
>>> junction  points,  and supply or reference points.
>>> 
>>> This is probably an obvious question, but not to me.  What is this asking 
>>> for?
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Thank you,
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Bob Knight, CET III
>>> 
>>> Fire by Knight, LLC
>>> 
>>> 208-318-3057
>>> 
>>> <image001.jpg>
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> 
>>> NOTICE - This communication may contain confidential and privileged 
>>> information that is for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any 
>>> viewing, copying or distribution of, or reliance on this message by 
>>> unintended recipients is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
>>> message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message 
>>> and deleting it from your computer.
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________ 
>>> Sprinklerforum mailing list 
>>> [email protected]     
>>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>>>  
>> 
>>  
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sprinklerforum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> -- 
> 
> Benjamin Young
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to