Good points Skyler but it is worth mentioning that the decisions you mentions 
(13 vs 13r) etc. are subject to Geography and Jurisdiction. In Florida for 
instance, anything less than 50 sprinklers IS designed solely by the Sprinkler 
Contractor and we are responsible for answering that question. You can hire an 
engineer if you want too, but of course on smaller projects the additional cost 
can cost you the job.



Greg McGahan



4187 Farrington Road
Milton, FL 32583
O- 850-637-8535
C- 850-712-9555




From: Skyler Bilbo via Sprinklerforum
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2020 5:57 PM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Cc: Skyler Bilbo
Subject: Re: Covered Parking in 13R

I don't think this has been said yet on this thread, but I think it is worth 
mentioning.  It is not a fire sprinkler contractor's job to decide where 
sprinklers are required, and/or which standard is applicable (NFPA 13/13R).  I 
know we all probably do this, but we really shouldn't.  I would bet over half 
of contractors don't know half as much as they should about this subject (me 
included; and I think I know a lot about it).  

Long story: There are so many caveats to the Building Code, which trigger 
different requirements for this, which are different in each year of the 
codes/standards, and often different between jurisdictions.  We don't know (and 
I find that it often isn't listed anywhere in the prints) if the Architect used 
a building code tradeoff (larger building area, lower fire ratings, longer 
egress distance, etc) that would automatically trigger the requirement of a 
NFPA 13 system throughout (not 13R, even though it may be less than 4 story 
residential).  It could be that the building is close enough to another 
adjacent building that it requires a NFPA 13 system, or a rated exterior wall 
(which we wouldn't know the option they selected).  There could be separated 
occupancies (with firewalls), mixed occupancies, or accessory occupancies, all 
of which may require a different approach/NFPA standard to be applied.  The 
building mentioned may or may not be a "podium building" (IBC 510.2).  Chapter 
9 of the IBC may, or may not, have minimum requirements for sprinklers based 
solely on occupancy.  This is just a few of the things that I can think of off 
the top of my head.  I'm sure I'm missing some, and there are too many specific 
situations to list here: it would be a novel (like a building code).

Long story short: don't take on the liability by quoting sprinklers in some 
areas, not in others, or with NFPA 13 in some areas and/or NFPA 13R in 
others/throughout, when you really don't know what you are doing.

What I would do: call the Architect. Get it from them (in writing) where 
sprinklers are required and if it is required to be designed per NFPA 13 or 
NFPA 13R.  It is best to do this early on in the bidding process, and try to 
get it sent in an addenda so that your competition bids it the same way you do. 
 Of course, I have done this, and my competition beats me by still bidding it 
incorrectly and against the addenda, and no one realizes that the sprinkler 
system is installed incorrectly, except me, when I walk through the building a 
year later.  That's life in this business.


My $0.02, that no one asked for,

Skyler Bilbo

1700 S. Raney Street
Effingham, IL 62401
217-819-6404 Direct
217-347-7315 Fax

sbi...@wenteplumbing.com
www.wenteplumbing.com

**new** www.beplumb.com
Like us on facebook for updates


On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 4:50 PM Art Tiroly via Sprinklerforum 
<sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org> wrote:
Residential use above a parking garage changes the occupancy requirement to a 
mixed use and NFPA 13 design criteria is required. Therefore protect the 
garage. Am I on the right track here?
 
 
Art Tiroly
ATCO Fire Protection/Tiroly
24400 Highland Rd CLE 44143
216-621-8899
216-570-7030 cell
 
 
 
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On 
Behalf Of John Irwin via Sprinklerforum
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2020 5:55 AM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Cc: John Irwin
Subject: Covered Parking in 13R
 
I have a 3-story, 13R building. Type IIB construction. On the “engineered” bid 
set, no sprinklers are shown in the covered parking area. This area is inside 
the footprint of the first floor, with 2nd floor units being located above the 
parking area. There are no garage doors and the parking spaces are not 
separated. To sprinkle or not to sprinkle?
 
 
 
John Irwin
West Coast Branch Manager
Quick Response Fire Protection
www.quickresponsefl.com 
Office: 844-9QUICKFL
Cell: 727-282-9243
Main Office: 20545 Independence Blvd. Unit G Groveland, Florida 34736
West Coast: 15201 Roosevelt Blvd., Suite 113, Clearwater, Florida 33760
East Coast:   3133 Skyway Circle, Suite 104, Melbourne, Florida 32934
24 Hour Emergency Service Available 1-844-9QUICKFL
 
 
“The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of low price 
is forgotten.” – Benjamin Franklin
 



This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. 
www.avast.com 

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to