NFPA 13 - 2019 - The answer depends on the hazard and the sprinkler type.
ESFR and CMSA do have requirements that address this issue.  For light and
ordinary hazards, as long as the individual widths are 4' or less with some
separation to allow water to hit the floor,and the sprinkler deflector is
above the obstruction, no additional sprinklers are needed.

*The above is my opinion and has not been processed as a formal
interpretation in accordance with the NFPA Regulations Governing Committee
Projects. This is provided with the understanding that the AFSA assumes no
liability for this opinion or actions taken on it and they are not to be
considered the official position of the **AFSA, and/or NFPA or its
technical committees.**AFSA cannot provide design or consulting engineering
services, and this opinion should therefore not be considered, nor relied
upon, as such.*

Thanks,
John

John August Denhardt, PE
*Vice President, Engineering and Technical Services*

*American Fire Sprinkler Association*
m: p: 301-343-1457
214-349-5965 ext 121
w: firesprinkler.org
<https://www.facebook.com/firesprinkler.org/>
<https://twitter.com/afsa/status/1039528345367732224>
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/american-fire-sprinkler-association-afsa-/>
   <https://www.instagram.com/firesprinklerorg/>

*Our members are at the heart of everything we do.*


*Are you a member with a technical question? *

Don't forget one of the most valuable resources that American Fire
Sprinkler Association provides is technical reviews from our Engineering &
Technical Services Department. It’s like having an FPE on your staff. Visit
www.firesprinkler.org/interp
<https://www.firesprinkler.org/WWW/Contacts/Sign_In.aspx?WebsiteKey=3dff22a3-0306-479c-bccc-7aa1986c8ada&LoginRedirect=true&returnurl=/WWW/Technical_Services/Informal_Interpretations/WWW/Informal_Interpret/Member_View.aspx?hkey=8023e65f-a2ad-4465-9920-0f9313a07324>
to
submit a question today!


On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 11:29 AM Joe Burtell via Sprinklerforum <
sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org> wrote:

> I apologize if this has already been asked and answered. I could have sworn
> NFPA addressed this but I am looking for when a group of mechanical pipes
> are racked and create a wide obstruction, what the minimum gaps between
> pipe to not consider it a solid obstruction? Can someone point me to the
> correct section, please?
>
> Best regards,
>
> *Joe Burtell, SET, CFPS*
>
> [image: Burtell Fire_Small]
>
> Phone | Fax | Mobile| Text *406-204-4653 <++1-406-204-4653>*
>
> 116 N. 11th Street | Billings, MT 59101
>
> Email: j...@burtellfire.com
>
> Web Site: http://www.burtellfire.com
>
> *“**The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of low
> price is forgotten.**”*
>
> *NOTICE:*  The information contained in this e-mail transmission is
> intended only for use of the individual or entity named above.  This e-mail
> transmission, and any documents, files, previous e-mail transmissions or
> other information attached to it, may contain confidential information that
> is legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient of this
> e-mail transmission, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it
> to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure,
> dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of this transmission or
> any of the information contained in or attached to this e-mail is strictly
> prohibited.  If you have received this e-mail transmission in error, please
> immediately notify us by return e-mail transmission and destroy the
> original e-mail transmission as well as its attachments without reading or
> saving it in any manner.  Thank you.
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to