Yes, this is a 400 gpm vertical inline. The horizontal pump tends to to 
follow the 250 gpm increments but vertical inlines can go every 50 or 100.   
  
  
  
Todd G Williams, PE  
Fire Protection Design/Consulting
  
Stonington, CT
  
860-535-2080 (tel:860-535-2080)  (ofc)
  
860-554-7054 (tel:860-554-7054)     (fax)
  
860-608-4559 (tel:860-608-4559)  (cell)
  
  
  
  

  
  
>   
> On Oct 6, 2025 at 5:32 PM,  <Bob Caputo (mailto:[email protected])>  
> wrote:
>   
>   
>   
> Are you sure you have a fire pump rated at 400 gpm?    Listed fire pumps come 
> in 250, 500, 750 etc gpm.    Not 400 gpm.    That aside, perhaps adding a 
> water storage tank will solve the problem?   
>   
>   
>   
>   
>   
>   
>   
>   
>   
>   
>   
>   
>   
>   
>  Bob Caputo, CFPS
>   
>   
>   
>   President
>   
>   
>   
>   
> American Fire Sprinkler Association
>   
>   
>   
>   
>  p:
>   
>  214-349-5965 ext124
>   
>   
>   
>  w:
>   
>   firesprinkler.org (http://firesprinkler.org/)     
>   
>   
>   
>             
>   
>   
>   
>   
>         
>
> Train a safer, more efficient workforce.
>
>   
>
> By enrolling your employees in the   AFSA Apprenticeship Training Series for 
> Sprinkler Fitters 
> (https://www.firesprinkler.org/WWW/Education/Apprentice_Training/WWW/Education/Apprenticeship_Training.aspx?hkey=e88ef09e-d74c-407f-abcd-995aff866149),
>  you will reap the benefits of a qualified, professional installation crew. 
> Well-trained employees will work smarter, increasing your company's 
> productivity and, in turn, its profits.   Learn more 
> (https://www.firesprinkler.org/WWW/Education/Apprentice_Training/WWW/Education/Apprenticeship_Training.aspx?hkey=e88ef09e-d74c-407f-abcd-995aff866149).
>    
>
>   
>   
>   
>   
>   
>
>   
>
>   
>   
> On Mon, Oct 6, 2025 at 11:23 AM Fpdcdesign  <[email protected] 
> (mailto:[email protected])>  wrote:
>   
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> >   Kyle, As I mentioned, there are several issues with this site I didn’t 
> > mention. One is approximately 1000 ft of 80 year old, severely tuberculated 
> > 8” main (estimate C=30) that feeds the site. The first thing is that this 
> > needs to be replaced. Once that is done, the 825 is very possible.
> >   
> >
> >   
> > CW, I have all of that info. I have been working on this since 2021 and it 
> > just came back to life after a year away. 825 gpm is the sprinkler demand 
> > only. There is a raw water supply that would be used for hose streams.   
> >   
> >
> >   
> > I hesitate to post many specifics of the project here as what is going on 
> > could result in litigation.   
> >   
> >   
> >   
> > Todd G Williams, PE  
> > Fire Protection Design/Consulting
> >   
> > Stonington, CT
> >   
> > 860-535-2080 (tel:860-535-2080)  (ofc)
> >   
> > 860-554-7054 (tel:860-554-7054)     (fax)
> >   
> > 860-608-4559 (tel:860-608-4559)  (cell)
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >
> >   
> >   
> > >   
> > > On Oct 6, 2025 at 11:26 AM,  <Kyle.Montgomery 
> > > (mailto:[email protected])>  wrote:
> > >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > > “Neither pump has ever passed its initial test due to the water supply”. 
> > > So, the water supply can’t even provide 600 GPM to the little pump? If 
> > > that’s the case, there is no workaround other than adding a water tank. 
> > > You can commission the pump without reaching 150% of the rated capacity, 
> > > but you have to at least meet the demand flow and pressure. If you can’t 
> > > get to 600 GPM, you certainly aren’t getting to 825 GPM.
> > >
> > >   
> > >
> > >   
> > >
> > >   
> > >
> > > -Kyle M at Aero
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >   
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > >   
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > > From:   Fpdcdesign  <[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])>
> > >   Sent:  Monday, October 6, 2025 7:24 AM
> > >   To:  Sprinklerforum  <[email protected] 
> > > (mailto:[email protected])>
> > >   Subject:  [External][Sprinklerforum] Multiple undersized pumps.
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > >   
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > > I am working on a project for a facility with several small and medium 
> > > sized buildings. Only some of the buildings are sprinklered. This 
> > > location has a plethora of problems but I only have one that i will bring 
> > > here.   
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > >   
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > > The facility has a very bad water supply and a new building was 
> > > constructed, complete with fire pump, to meet a demand of 825 gpm. Also 
> > > on this site is a fire pump house with a 400 gpm at 75 psi pump that 
> > > takes suction from the main. I was told this pump only feeds a dedicated 
> > > main to 3 buildings. However, I subsequently found that the pump actually 
> > > ties into the underground feeding the entire site, including the new 
> > > building. Now I have a main fed by a pump with a maximum flow of 600 gpm 
> > > feeding a 750 gpm pump. Is there any way to get this to work? There is no 
> > > by-pass around the 400 gpm pump. Not sure if that would make a 
> > > difference. I would appreciate input from those mightier than I.   
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > >   
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > > Neither pump has ever passed its   initial test due to the water supply.
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > >   
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > > Todd G Williams, PE
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > > Fire Protection Design/Consulting
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > > Stonington, CT
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > > 860-535-2080 (tel:860-535-2080)  (ofc)
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > > 860-554-7054 (tel:860-554-7054)     (fax)
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > >
> > > 860-608-4559 (tel:860-608-4559)  (cell)
> > >
> > >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > >   
> > >  _________________________________________________________ SprinklerForum 
> > > mailing list:  
> > > https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org
> > >   To unsubscribe send an email to  
> > > [email protected] 
> > > (mailto:[email protected])
> > >   
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >  _________________________________________________________
> >  SprinklerForum mailing list:
> >   
> > https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org
> >  To unsubscribe send an email to  
> > [email protected] 
> > (mailto:[email protected])      
> > _________________________________________________________ SprinklerForum 
> > mailing list: 
> > https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org 
> > To unsubscribe send an email to 
> > [email protected]            
_________________________________________________________
SprinklerForum mailing list:
https://lists.firesprinkler.org/list/sprinklerforum.lists.firesprinkler.org
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to