On Tue, 15 Oct 2002 01:08, Elizabeth Ziph wrote: > [monk] omits to mention: sql-ledger works, correctly. Code is > reasonably structured. This code review omits to measure the value the > code delivers. Safety concerns can be addressed by running on a secure > Intranet.
I don't buy the Monks point, but I don't buy yours either. People want to (and do) access their accounts over the Internet. With SL one can visit a client, perform a service, and from the client's office, befor leaving, record the transaction, print an invoice, exact and record payment. So, security is important, and so is undestanding whether (and why) the transactions can be done securely. -- Cheers John Summerfield Microsoft's most solid OS: http://www.geocities.com/rcwoolley/ Join the "Linux Support by Small Businesses" list at http://mail.computerdatasafe.com.au/mailman/listinfo/lssb ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ------------------------------------------------------- (un)subscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
