> Rather than this dismissal, I would _much_ prefer some detail (preferably on > the website) that assures us that the code is safe and secure. > Since Rubem is offerring to get his hands dirty, and to do so involves digging > though the code and userstanding it, maybe he's the best person for it?
There are a number of people who have been looking at the code. I know I've been watching for security as I am in the code...and I've added comments to existing code in addition to my own new code. What type of "detail" on the website would assure anything about the code? I suppose there are stamps of approval which could be obtained, and hopefully most of them would be from authorities which you would trust. If you personally don't understand the code, you always have to trust someone else's opinion. The "someone" might be a friend, a known professional, a trusted business, a trusted software company, a trusted accounting firm such as Arthur Andersen LLP... ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ------------------------------------------------------- (un)subscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
