On May 1, 2007, at 11:14 AM, Rick Morrison wrote:
> Huh? I thought this was something you wanted....I guess I > misunderstood the thread. > > I don't have time to do this by myself. If someone wants to pick it > up and run with it, I'll be happy to work with you and to host the > buildslave here, or I'm OK with just letting the thing die, too. > er, i thought you said you could set up a slave if someone could set up a master ? im just asking if anyone knows how hardware/ configurational-intensive it is to run a buildbot master, which I could run on my own host if its a lightweight process. my thing with buildbots is, when Grig first approached me about setting one up for SA, i read the docs for how to set up a slave and i was overwhelmed by how complicated it was, for something i think should be very simple (i.e., heres the trunk, heres the host, heres the work directory, heres the unit test command: now run). so i tend to avoid things like that and im almost considering just giving you a shell script that will do an svn up, detect changes and just run the tests (but we'll probably go with buildbots since its the standard now...). --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
