It would be terrific to be able to satisfy my use case, but is "schema.owner.table" the right way to go? It seems as though "schema" and "owner" mean similar things in MSSQL and it might be confusing to use them as Rick proposed. I guess you'd just have to be pretty clear in documentation.
What about the quote_schema attribute on the Table? I was going to suggest adding a check of quote_schema in the ANSIIdentifierPreparer.format_table(), but that doesn't seem quite right either. Even if the quote_schema default were changed to True this would still mean that you would not be quoting some identifiers that required it. It would feel kind of like a hack. I guess the "schema.owner.table" thing is probably best. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
