On Jun 12, 12:45 pm, "Gaetan de Menten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've already said it earlier but since you didn't comment on that, > maybe you didn't see my remark: shouldn't the non-generative aggregate > methods be deprecated? I feek it would be much more coherent this way.> -- yes id be fine with that. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
- [sqlalchemy] Re: PROPOSAL: whack query.select(), select... Neil Blakey-Milner
- [sqlalchemy] Re: PROPOSAL: whack query.select(), s... Michael Bayer
- [sqlalchemy] Re: PROPOSAL: whack query.select(... Neil Blakey-Milner
- [sqlalchemy] Re: PROPOSAL: whack query.sel... Michael Bayer
- [sqlalchemy] Re: PROPOSAL: whack query.select(), select... svilen
- [sqlalchemy] Re: PROPOSAL: whack query.select(), select... Paul Kippes
- [sqlalchemy] Re: PROPOSAL: whack query.select(), select... Jonathan Ellis
- [sqlalchemy] Re: PROPOSAL: whack query.select(), s... Michael Bayer
- [sqlalchemy] Re: PROPOSAL: whack query.select(... Gaetan de Menten
- [sqlalchemy] Re: PROPOSAL: whack query.sel... Michael Bayer
- [sqlalchemy] Re: PROPOSAL: whack query.select(... Jonathan Ellis