Hi, if 2005 supports ROW_NUMBER() OVER ORDER BY like oracle does, then yes > this could be a possible feature enhancement. >
Another approach that occured to me is doing TOP (limit+offset) then seeking the cursor. For server-side cursors this is probably nearly as efficient as LIMIT/OFFSET. I've raised #639 so we don't forget about this. Paul --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
