Thank you all for looking into this - most appreciated! On Jul 10, 6:13 pm, "Paul Johnston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > if 2005 supports ROW_NUMBER() OVER ORDER BY like oracle does, then yes > > > this could be a possible feature enhancement. > > Another approach that occured to me is doing TOP (limit+offset) then seeking > the cursor. For server-side cursors this is probably nearly as efficient as > LIMIT/OFFSET. > > I've raised #639 so we don't forget about this. > > Paul
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
