There are good reasons to support full outer join. Some are suggested in the comments to that one article. :)
I don't miss right joins though, I find left join more natural. On 8/1/07, Michael Bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > we currently dont have a "right" outer join. but this is not by > accident...theres really no use case for a "right" outer join, which > are more easily written as left outer joins. > > some good articles on whats wrong with RIGHT outer join as well as > FULL outer join: > > http://weblogs.sqlteam.com/jeffs/archive/2006/03/14/9289.aspx > http://weblogs.sqlteam.com/jeffs/archive/2007/04/19/Full-Outer- > Joins.aspx?x=1 > > > > On Aug 1, 2007, at 5:56 PM, mc wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > I read in the docs about joins and saw an example for left outer join, > > though I didn't understand where the "left" was specified. > > How is a right outer join specified? > > > > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
