I don't need the ROJ either, just didn't understand how it "knows by itself" to make it a LEFT :-)
On Aug 2, 6:52 pm, "Jonathan Ellis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There are good reasons to support full outer join. Some are suggested > in the comments to that one article. :) > > I don't miss right joins though, I find left join more natural. > > On 8/1/07, Michael Bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > we currently dont have a "right" outer join. but this is not by > > accident...theres really no use case for a "right" outer join, which > > are more easily written as left outer joins. > > > some good articles on whats wrong with RIGHT outer join as well as > > FULL outer join: > > >http://weblogs.sqlteam.com/jeffs/archive/2006/03/14/9289.aspx > >http://weblogs.sqlteam.com/jeffs/archive/2007/04/19/Full-Outer- > > Joins.aspx?x=1 > > > On Aug 1, 2007, at 5:56 PM, mc wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > I read in the docs about joins and saw an example for left outer join, > > > though I didn't understand where the "left" was specified. > > > How is a right outer join specified? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
