On Monday 20 August 2007 18:01:49 jason kirtland wrote: > svilen wrote: > > a suggestion about _list_decorators() and similar. > > they can be easily made into classes, i.e. non dynamic (and > > overloadable/patchable :-). > > The stdlib decorators end up in a static, module-level dictionary > that can be manipulated if you want to. Wouldn't this be replacing > a dict with some_cls.__dict__?
well, more or less... i use similar function-made locals() namespaces a _lot_, and maybe thats why i avoid using them whenever i can - their contents is not easily changeable/inheritable/splitable... programaticaly, piece-by-piece. whatever. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
