On 9/5/07, Paul Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> >data.  I did some benchmarks a while back to see how everything
> >stacked up as I was wondering if I was doing everything the hard way
> >(in C++) instead of using SqlAlchemy, etc.  TurboEntity is the same as
> >
> >
> Great work Eric.
>
> I am quite surprised at the results. I would have thought
> ActiveMapper/TurboEntity would only be marginally slower than plain
> SQLAlchemy.

To make this really clear (even though Michael said it already),
ActiveMapper, TurboEntity and Elixir are not any slower than SA ORM.
What is slower is SA ORM compared to SA SQL layer. In fact, Elixir
querying system *is* SQLAlchemy proper.

-- 
Gaƫtan de Menten
http://openhex.org

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sqlalchemy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to