> I am quite surprised at the results. I would have thought > ActiveMapper/TurboEntity would only be marginally slower than plain > SQLAlchemy. And again, I'm surprised that SA is faster than MySQLdb. How > does that work out? I though SA used MySQLdb??? Your use of query cache > and best of three sounds sensible, but I've got a feeling we're seeing > some kind of measurement effect in the results.
I think SA is caching the results of the queries, so it has less processing to do than MySQLdb for the repeat queries. > > If those numbers are correct though, I'd expect fairly simple changes to > Elixir could bring the performance close to plain SA. > I think that's a reasonable assumption - I haven't had a chance to poke around under the hood due to other priorities, but I like Elixir and hope to see it improve in future versions. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
