Hi Mike - That did the trick!
But, the strange thing is, if you note the illustration above, for both situations I was selecting on a key, and there was only a single row for each. Why would one require the result.close(), and the other not? Yes, I wasn't sure the error is that all important - BUT, is it indicative some of problem in the lower reaches somewhere? Also, when doing these queries is it recommended to always do a "result.close()"? Perhaps there would be a way for this to be "automatically" handled.. Thanks so much, David --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
