On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 22:00:54 -0300 "Roger Demetrescu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At that time, the test script was also failing with 0.4 (unreleased), > and turning off > `supports_sane_multi_rowcount` fixed it. Yes, in fact. As said, `supports_sane_multi_rowcount` should stay to False, while I'm arguing about the other, `supports_sane_rowcount` also currently set to False under FB (IIRC, you switched both to False in a single patch a few months ago), but which I'm unable to notice any difference in test results changing its setting. > Hmmm... I don't have FB in this machine now... but would you mind test > the script > from [2] in the scenario you described above ? I'll do my best at reboot, I'm way too sleepy right now |-) And, BTW, any chance for a review of the testcase I attached at the beginning of this thread? I'll try to revisit it in the light of what Michael said... the intention was to cover also that ticket. > Hei, thanks for the great job you are doing with firebird.py... :) I have been "waiting" for months, very busy on other things (well, if "SA over M$SQL" is "another thing"... ;-) but I'm finally having lot of fun with it [almost as usual, when it comes to Python]! You're welcome anyway!! ciao, lele. -- nickname: Lele Gaifax | Quando vivrò di quello che ho pensato ieri real: Emanuele Gaifas | comincerò ad aver paura di chi mi copia. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Fortunato Depero, 1929. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
