Michael Bayer wrote: > A self-referential relationship, when configured as many-to-one, > requires the "remote_side" argument to indicate this, as described in > http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/04/mappers.html#advdatamapping_relation_selfreferential > . Otherwise it defaults to "one-to-many".
That sounds correct, but this was not about a self-referential relationship. The "Relations" table maps a one-to-many relationship from some object to a number of objects (ordered). Or am I missing something? \malthe --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
