On Tuesday 15 July 2008 15:30:31 Heston James - Cold Beans wrote: > Hello Again Svil: > > That sounds like a fair enough solution to me, seems safer than > > the more generic version. > > > > Thanks for the tip mate, sounds really great. I'll play around > > with that concept. > > > > Heston > > I've tested this little concept and it works really nicely :-D > thanks. > > One quick question I'd like to pick your brain on. With filter(), > is that filter applied at the SQL level? yes. pass an echo=True to the create_engine() (or whereever else u could pass that) and u'll see the sql.
> Or are _all_ records > returned from the database and then SQLAlchemy applies the filter? > > I'm just trying to get an idea of performance when we have many > records, I'd hate to be pulling them _all_ from the database with > each query. > > Heston > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
