OK, thank you. But one last thought: Is storing the query rather than the result really the way?
I mean, after a couple dozen complex, expensive change operations, the user could end up with only 4 records. It would be more efficient to just store the indexes rather than redo all the queries over and over again. On the other hand, with only a few simple queries and thousands of resulting records, storing the indexes is obviously a drain. Something about eating cake comes to mind. Thanks again, Adam --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
