On Nov 7, 2008, at 12:18 PM, Adam Ryan wrote:
> > OK, thank you. > > But one last thought: Is storing the query rather than the result > really the way? > > I mean, after a couple dozen complex, expensive change operations, the > user could end up with only 4 records. It would be more efficient to > just store the indexes rather than redo all the queries over and over > again. if its only a few records that you can place into an in_() clause, then yes this is probably more efficient. > On the other hand, with only a few simple queries and thousands of > resulting records, storing the indexes is obviously a drain. if many records, then yes storing the criterion alone is more efficient :). --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
