Dnia 2009-10-08, czw o godzinie 11:16 -0400, Michael Bayer pisze: > Tefnet Developers wrote: > > > > Dnia 2009-10-08, czw o godzinie 09:59 -0400, Michael Bayer pisze: > >> > Is this a SQLAlchemy bug or my mistake? > >> > >> Backrefs deal with the two-way relation between A<->B, but the event > >> does > >> not propagate in most cases to C or beyond, i.e. A<->B<->C where B is > >> attached to A would indicate C->B becomes detached in memory. After a > >> commit() all those references would be expired and then you'd see the > >> actual connections.
Yes, sorry, I had a mistake in my test and in fact the behaviour is consistent. I have just created my own AttributeExtension which handles these situations. Thanks for clarifying things out :). regards, Filip Zyzniewski Tefnet --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
