On Mar 21, 2010, at 6:20 PM, Matthew wrote:
> I got around this by switching to declarative and declaring my
> property like this:
>
> _id = column_property(Column("id",Integer,primary_key=True),
> comparator_factory=some_comparator_factory())
>
> And then used @synonym_for for the getter:
>
> @synonym_for("_id")
> @property
> def id(self):
> return some_function(self._id)
>
> I'm still not sure what was wrong with my original code, so would be
> interested in any comments, for academic reasons.
your original test appeared to have a class descending from object.
comparable_using applies to declarative classes. If you were using mapper(),
you'd take the output from comparable_using and pass it to the "properties"
dictionary of mapper() - but more likely you'd use comparable_property()
directly pass your comparator straight in to column_property(), as introduced
in http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/mappers.html#custom-comparators and linking
to an example at
http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/reference/orm/mapping.html#sqlalchemy.orm.comparable_property
.
>
> Thank you!
>
> Matthew
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "sqlalchemy" group.
> To post to this group, send email to sqlalch...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en.
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sqlalchemy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalch...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en.
