On Friday, February 26, 2016 at 7:45:46 PM UTC+1, Jonathan Vanasco wrote: I'm not either, and I'm scared of the SQL that would be generated and the > wire traffic/memory if there were. That would be subselects within > subqueryloads within... this also seems a bit more about "updates to > associations" vs "association_proxy". >
True. I admit this would be rather complicated but as I'm new to SA and everybody has SA in high regard I hoped it could be capable of doing such a thing. Thanks for taking time to reply and for all information you provided which is very helpful. Regards, Piotr -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.