yup, sorry erik - I didn't realize it defaulted to private (used to github I guess). It is now public.
Jarrett Chisholm Prylynx Corporation /IT should be this simple/ [email protected] www.prylynx.com T: (519) 895-0600 On 05/10/12 03:27 AM, Erik Janssens wrote: > I think your repo is private ? because I have no permission to > view it. > > On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Jarrett Chisholm <[email protected]> > wrote: >> oh also, the repo is at: >> >> https://bitbucket.org/jarrettchisholm/elixir >> >> I pulled from here for the camelot code (hopefully it's the latest...): >> http://gitorious.org/camelot >> >> Also, the url on your camelot site to get the source code doesn't work >> (at least not for me)...needs to be >> 'git://gitorious.org/camelot/camelot.git' and not >> '[email protected]:camelot/camelot.git'. (I think the later requires you >> to have your ssh public key registered with the project). >> >> cheers >> >> Jarrett Chisholm >> Prylynx Corporation >> IT should be this simple >> >> [email protected] >> www.prylynx.com >> T: (519) 895-0600 >> >> On 04/10/12 02:55 PM, Jarrett Chisholm wrote: >>> Hey Erik, >>> >>> Thanks for the reply. >>> >>> Yeah that sounds cool. I'm going to have my local copy point to both >>> the bitbucket and github repos (I'll push/pull to/from both). >>> >>> For getting elixir 'updated' with the camelot code, is it mostly the >>> stuff in the 'orm' directory that I want to be looking at? >>> >>> cheers >>> >>> Jarrett Chisholm >>> Prylynx Corporation >>> IT should be this simple >>> >>> [email protected] >>> www.prylynx.com >>> T: (519) 895-0600 >>> >>> On 02/10/12 01:18 AM, Erik Janssens wrote: >>>> Hello Jarrett, >>>> >>>> Camelot as a whole project is GPL. >>>> >>>> However the orm module as it is now in gitorious (not yet released), should >>>> not be GPL. >>>> >>>> I originally started with writing some GPL code to mimic Elixir behavior, >>>> and >>>> later on copied parts of the original BSD code of elixir into them. >>>> >>>> The code now more looks like the original Elixir code with some additions >>>> of >>>> mine. I have no issues with releasing those additions as BSD of course. >>>> >>>> So if you want to go ahead with this, simply let me know, and we'll sort it >>>> out. >>>> >>>> Erik >>>> >>>> PS : may I suggest bitbucket for cooperation ? I've used it in some recent >>>> projects and am happy with it. Especially the posibility to work with >>>> subrepos >>>> is handy for integration purposes. >>>> >>>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 5:04 AM, Jarrett Chisholm >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Hi Eric, >>>>> >>>>> I'm sifting through some of the orm code for Camelot (with the intention >>>>> of >>>>> maybe merging some of it into Elixir). However, I've stopped due to the >>>>> copyright - it's GPL, not MIT. I'm not entirely sure about how licenses >>>>> work and such, but is this kosher? i.e. with the 2 licenses, is it ok to >>>>> copy your changes from Camelot into the elixir core? >>>>> >>>>> For anyone interested, I put a copy of the elixir source onto github (got >>>>> the latest version from SVN a couple months ago): >>>>> https://github.com/jarrettchisholm/elixir >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Cheers >>>>> >>>>> Jarrett Chisholm >>>>> Prylynx Corporation >>>>> IT should be this simple >>>>> >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> www.prylynx.com >>>>> T: (519) 895-0600 >>>>> >>>>> On 12/09/12 04:48 AM, Erik Janssens wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hello Gaetan, >>>>> >>>>> Good to hear from you. It's a pity that you don't do any more >>>>> database work, we would all benefit from it ;) >>>>> >>>>> About the copyright/thanks, those will be added should I release >>>>> the code of course. It was my original intention to simply write >>>>> a compatibility layer for Elixir code to Declarative, but when diving >>>>> into it I saw the added value Elixir still provides on top of Declarative, >>>>> and then started to copy/paste parts and unit tests, and it evolved >>>>> to a modified copy. >>>>> >>>>> The original documentation would indeed only need some changes. >>>>> I've removed things that were marked as deprecated and changed >>>>> to setup steps a little bit (but those were not documented). >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Erik >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Gaėtan de Menten <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 10:13 AM, [email protected] <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> As part of the Camelot project http://www.python-camelot.com/, >>>>> and to migrate our existing applications from Elixir to Declarative, >>>>> I've reworked Elixir to be a layer on top of Declarative. Most >>>>> of the existing Elixir unit tests pass with the new code. >>>>> >>>>> Ah! You've done what I dreamed to do but never found the >>>>> time/motivation to do it (since I don't use Elixir or any database >>>>> stuff for work, Elixir now competes with many other activities for my >>>>> free time). My ultimate goal was in fact to clean it up enough to >>>>> propose it for inclusion into SQLAlchemy. >>>>> >>>>> Elixir is still very useful in that way because it's much easier to >>>>> define relationships with Elixir than with pure Declarative. Also, >>>>> it's a good basis to implement custom usage patterns. (which >>>>> was the original purpose of Elixir) >>>>> >>>>> Indeed. >>>>> >>>>> This code is now part of the Camelot codebase, but it could be >>>>> useful for non gui projects as well. >>>>> >>>>> So if somebody is prepared to take this code and release it >>>>> as Elixir 0.8 and do the project maintenance (packages, >>>>> documentation, etc), I'm willing to cooperate and split this code >>>>> out of Camelot. >>>>> >>>>> Packages is no big deal. Documentation can be but most of the current >>>>> Elixir documentation should apply. I can't commit any time to Elixir >>>>> these days for various reasons but I could have some in the future. >>>>> I'll come back to you if that is ever the case. I had also a few >>>>> features in my local copy waiting for cleanup and commit but well... >>>>> no time. >>>>> >>>>> If nobody steps in, the code will just remain where it is now. >>>>> >>>>> That's a bit sad but perfectly understandable. >>>>> >>>>> Any thoughts or ideas ? >>>>> >>>>> Just a small deception: I found no trace of any copyright or even >>>>> "thanks" to the original Elixir developers on your code/modified >>>>> version of Elixir. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Gaėtan de Menten >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>>>> "SQLElixir" group. >>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>> [email protected]. >>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/sqlelixir?hl=en. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>>>> "SQLElixir" group. >>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>> [email protected]. >>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/sqlelixir?hl=en. >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "SQLElixir" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/sqlelixir?hl=en. >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SQLElixir" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlelixir?hl=en.
