Thank you Simon,

I do see the inconsistency and thanks for those examples. I had answered
previously before I saw your explanation and I now see why there is
concern. It certainly appears to be inconsistent given such use cases.

On 27 January 2017 at 10:26, Michael Falconer <michael.j.falco...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Ersin,
>
> apologies if I seem to be suffering from terminal thickness, but I still
> don't get it. Why would I expect anything other than column interpretation
> from a single quoted argument. I *want to be told* that my column does
> not exist, I don't want a calculated index so why should I be expecting
> one. On the other hand if I choose double quotes I'm probably doing
> something different. Maybe someone else should weigh in and the penny will
> finally drop if I am missing the point, but I'm still not seeing crawly
> things. :-)
>
>
> On 27 January 2017 at 10:01, Ersin Akinci <ersin.aki...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Michael,
>>
>> If I understood DRH and Simon correctly, I think the cause for concern
>> is that SQLite should be interpreting the single quotes as a string
>> literal, yet it interprets it as a column. Perhaps it's a strange
>> example (i.e., why would you want to index a string literal?), but
>> still, the behavior deviates from what's expected, the expected
>> behavior being that we should get a calculated index.
>>
>> Best,
>> Ersin
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Michael Falconer
>> <michael.j.falco...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Simon,
>> >
>> > as I see it there is no problem here. Explicit quoting regardless, the
>> > column does not exist and an error is returned, isn't this the expected
>> > outcome? In the DRH quoted section a reason is presented as to why no
>> error
>> > is returned due to a built in default action. This may or may not be a
>> > point for further analysis (ie. is this an appropriate default) but I'm
>> not
>> > seeing obvious crawly things. Perhaps it's me missing something Simon
>> but
>> > I'm not overly concerned about the above. Don't use double quotes
>> (always
>> > single) and it would appear things are just fine. You'll get told if
>> your
>> > column is non-existent.
>> >
>> >
>> > On 27 January 2017 at 00:12, Simon Slavin <slav...@bigfraud.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> On 25 Jan 2017, at 12:50pm, Simon Slavin <slav...@bigfraud.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Bug is as follows:
>> >>
>> >> Anyone ?  Did I miss something and you’re all too polite to point it
>> out ?
>> >>
>> >> Simon.
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> sqlite-users mailing list
>> >> sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
>> >> http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Regards,
>> >      Michael.j.Falconer.
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > sqlite-users mailing list
>> > sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
>> > http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ersin Y. Akinci -- ersinakinci.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> sqlite-users mailing list
>> sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
>> http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>      Michael.j.Falconer.
>



-- 
Regards,
     Michael.j.Falconer.
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Reply via email to